I think it's rather more than tiny, isn't it?
I mean, as I understand it, Judge Gamble's ruling delays the law's introduction for a week, until she's heard arguments on Monday September 13, at which point she'll doubtless be persuaded to extend the injunction for as long as it takes for one side or the other to appeal her decision, and then it'll be extended again while one side or the other appeals the superior court's decision, and so on while the whole thing slowly makes its way back to the Supreme Court.
I could well be mistaken, though -- I really don't understand the US process.