danielravennest
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2018
- Messages
- 3,708
- SLU Posts
- 9073
I read somewhere that the modern understanding of the word "fan" is based on the Roman and Byzantine sporting factions. They could be incredibly violent and sometimes rioted and caused more deaths and property damage than modern football hooligans. It's probably nonsense but a nice thought.
- from Wikipedia - Nika Riots.On January 13, 532, a tense and angry populace arrived at the Hippodrome for the races.[citation needed] The Hippodrome was next to the palace complex, and thus Justinian could watch from the safety of his box in the palace and preside over the races. From the start, the crowd had been hurling insults at Justinian. By the end of the day, at race 22, the partisan chants had changed from "Blue" or "Green" to a unified Nίκα ("Nika", meaning "Win!" "Victory!" or "Conquer!"), and the crowds broke out and began to assault the palace. For the next five days, the palace was under siege.[citation needed] The fires that started during the tumult resulted in the destruction of much of the city, including the city's foremost church, the Hagia Sophia (which Justinian would later rebuild).
The sports factions had some of the aspects of political parties, and had political backers who were pissed at Justinian's high taxes and rooting out of corruption (which they benefited from).
"Fan" comes from a shortened version of the word fanatic. Fanatic itself, introduced into English around 1550, means "marked by excessive enthusiasm and often intense uncritical devotion". It comes from the Modern Latin fanaticus, meaning "insanely but divinely inspired". The word originally pertained to a temple or sacred place [Latin fanum, poetic English fane].


















