- Joined
- Sep 22, 2018
- Messages
- 42,521
- Location
- Moonbase Caligula
- SL Rez
- 2008
- Joined SLU
- 2009
- SLU Posts
- 55565
Someone from the oldest profession seems a good fit for the oldest president.
Agreed on all points. I'd be shocked if she was at all qualified. I say that because of who appointed her, not because I'd have anything against a former sex worker in office.Yeah, “Breaking! A hooker! Nothing wrong with honest work blah blah blah and she was actually an expensive girlfriend, and we won’t say who the executive is, but….”
Is she not qualified? Then write about that, or else don’t make it all about what you say you have respect for. Most of this administration isn’t qualified.
Sex = clicks, so I get it, though.
I'm certain we'd have a lot fewer problems if a random retired sex worker replaced Trump, lol.Someone from the oldest profession seems a good fit for the oldest president.
I'm not sure how compatible "sex worker" is with her security clearance, though. Whether she declared it or not during the vetting process would be important, too -- as I understand it, at least in the UK, they're pretty forgiving of most things, so long as you declare them beforehand. It's when someone keeps quiet about something potentially embarrassing that later transpire during the vetting process that they get upset.Yeah, “Breaking! A hooker! Nothing wrong with honest work blah blah blah and she was actually an expensive girlfriend, and we won’t say who the executive is, but….”
Is she not qualified? Then write about that, or else don’t make it all about what you say you have respect for. Most of this administration isn’t qualified.
Sex = clicks, so I get it, though.
Or just kept him preoccupied.I'm certain we'd have a lot fewer problems if a random retired sex worker replaced Trump, lol.
There's at least a possibility she's only very recently retired, if there's anything to this part of the story:... retired sex worker ...
That's not a situation that screams, "We're right on top of this whole national security thing."The complaint alleges — and Varvaro flatly denies — that she maintained a profile on Seeking.com under the name “Alessia,” advertising herself as someone who works for a government agency and offers “seductive sophistication.” The profile used the same photo as her Instagram. It was removed shortly after a Daily Mail reporter contacted her for comment, which is the kind of detail that really does pop on the page.
HOOKER!
Yeah, this is why I end up ignoring a lot of these sorts of stories. These people are doing so much worse and generally completely unqualofied for other reasons. I don't care that she was a sugar daddy chaser or whatever the proper name is that isn't hooker anymore than I care that AOC was a bartender really.Yeah, “Breaking! A hooker! Nothing wrong with honest work blah blah blah and she was actually an expensive girlfriend, and we won’t say who the executive is, but….”
Is she not qualified? Then write about that, or else don’t make it all about what you say you have respect for. Most of this administration isn’t qualified.
Sex = clicks, so I get it, though.
Well, he can go ahead and try to sue me. I posted this a couple of hours ago.
If you aren't dehumanizing the alleged criminal, you are "bad on crime", in the minds of the administrstion.What was that about Pope Leo being "bad on crime"?
Reuters: Exclusive: Trump’s DOJ has cut thousands of law-enforcement jobs while vowing to get tough on crime
Unless you're issuing pardons to your supporters and donors, that is.If you aren't dehumanizing the alleged criminal, you are "bad on crime", in the minds of the administrstion.