- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,764
- Location
- NJ suburb of Philadelphia
- SL Rez
- 2003
- SLU Posts
- 4494
Only 600 miles. Hell, the wall for Mexico is 1200 miles, should be doable.You don't understand. We need Canada so we can build a bridge to Greenland.
Only 600 miles. Hell, the wall for Mexico is 1200 miles, should be doable.You don't understand. We need Canada so we can build a bridge to Greenland.
Well, the Nares Strait between Ellesmere Island and Greenland ist just 25 kilometers wide at its narrowest point.Only 600 miles. Hell, the wall for Mexico is 1200 miles, should be doable.
www.rawstory.com
Someone needs to make sure the popcorn is halal first.![]()
'Murder fatwa against Trump' after president's 'unhinged' comment: ex-operative
There is reportedly a fatwa, or religious edict, against Donald Trump.Trump recently ratchetted up the language against Iranian officials on his social media, leading to a "murder fatwa" against him, according to an ex-insider. In 1989, Iran's Supreme Leader issued a fatwa against author Salman...www.rawstory.com
Who's got the popcorn?
This sounds serious!
![]()
'Murder fatwa against Trump' after president's 'unhinged' comment: ex-operative
There is reportedly a fatwa, or religious edict, against Donald Trump.Trump recently ratchetted up the language against Iranian officials on his social media, leading to a "murder fatwa" against him, according to an ex-insider. In 1989, Iran's Supreme Leader issued a fatwa against author Salman...www.rawstory.com
Who's got the popcorn?
FIFYYou don't understand. We need Canada so Greenland can pay for and build a bridge to Greenland
You don't understand. We need Canada soFIFYYou don't understand. We need Canada so Greenland can pay for and build a bridge to Greenland
I found it a very helpful guide to the reasoning behind the ruling, which seems very unconvincing. Later in the week he'll be looking at the dissenting opinion.it seems that while onlookers were (mis-)directed into worrying about what would happen if the Trump administration ignored court orders, the conservative majority on the US Supreme Court, with more subtlety and artistry, has now robbed federal judges from making many of the most unwelcome court orders in first place.
"Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump wrote.
"No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE," he added. "Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!"
Poor, poor Leon.And he wasn't done yet.
"We might have to put DOGE on Elon," Trump told reporters while preparing to board the Marine One helicopter. "DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn’t that be terrible?"
Asked whether he might deport Musk, Trump didn't rule out the possibility.
"I don’t know," he told media at the White House, adding that "we’ll have to take a look."

In other words, they want the EU to pay for American infrastructure.You don't understand. We need Canada soGreenlandDenmark can pay for and build a bridge to Greenland .
Fixed it.


The true freedom units.Can't build that in America. It uses meters.
Somehow, "Boeing is working on it" does not inspire the confidence it once might have.It would choke off the US space program because we have allowed a single vendor to take over. Well, Boeing is working on it too, but right now Space X has the most effective human launch system.
Foot is just meter in disguise, since over a century.Can't build that in America. It uses meters.
And here's his post about Justice Sotomayor's dissenting judgmentDavid Allen Green is doing a series of very readable discussions of the Supreme Court's Opinion in the case of Trump vs Casa, which prevents federal courts from issuing general injunctions.
The US Supreme Court judgment on injunctions - what Justice Barrett said
This sounds technical but, as DAG puts it
I found it a very helpful guide to the reasoning behind the ruling, which seems very unconvincing. Later in the week he'll be looking at the dissenting opinion.