You know it's strange. I see "TERF" floating past my social media at times, recently its been about safe spaces for women or women's sports. But it crops up fairly frequently.
You know what I've never seen, not even once? "TERM" which would be the same but relating to males instead of females.
Im pretty sure that 99% of the time when I see someone using TERF, it's just another way of attacking women.
Cis AFAB here. Why this is relevant will be apparent in a moment. Also, I'm 57 and I've been queer bi identified since my twenties.
There is a long, long history behind exclusion of trans women in pagan and lesbian spaces. I can speak directly to the pagan part, which was typical of the whole for the most part. People had good intentions in that they wanted to set up safe space where women, who in my generation had little to nothing of their own to themselves, could assemble, support each other and in the pagan case, have ritual experiences formed around female energy and female spiritual experience. Many, many of us have been subjected to abuse and silencing by men, and the older of us grew up in churches with no female clergy. We grew up in an atmosphere of abuse and oppression. It was important, and valuable, and necessary, to have spaces for women. We'd never have started to move out of the self-hating patriarchal mindset without it. It wasn't all psychological, either. Before the internet, women only lesbian spaces were vital for community building and networking in a rare setting of safety.
But the thing is this. You cannot get out of your oppression by handing it to someone else, not with gatekeeping, not with narrow definitions of identity, not with fears that the enemy is invading the moment someone slightly different shows up. That way lies fascism. And that's what happened eventually to the TERFS. They started out wanting to advocate for women as feminists, and wound up in league with conservatives (fascism really). If you define women as only those assigned female at birth, you have created some problems for all women:
1) you've given control of who identifies as a woman to the medical establishment (and by extension the government)
2) you've narrowed the definition of woman to an ideal feminine. This is going to exclude a lot of women, not just hetero cis AFAB, but queer women, enbys and trans women.
3) sovereignty over the self. I'm a woman because I SAY SO, not because I'm XX (presumably), not because I was once a potential childbearer, not because I used to have a brain saturated in estrogen, or any other bullshit that gives control TO PATRIARCHY.
Replying to the Rowling thread:
We now know that biological gender isn't a pure binary anyway. But the gender binarists don't care about updated science.
It's not the point anyway. Anybody who is sure she's a woman is a woman in my estimation. We can't gatekeep without denying human self sovereignty and autonomy.
Walling out the feared Other is not making anyone safer, especially in spaces that don't HAVE to be segregated, like a public gathering. It's not going to undo the consciousness raising I did in my twenties to participate in a gathering alongside someone who's only been living as a woman for a short time and may still be learning the ropes. It's not going to endanger me, damage the energy of the space or any such jazz. I am not so weak. While we're so far from the end of patriarchy, we cannot afford to not be warriors. Everyone who wants to take up the banner is welcome as far as I care. My feminism is inclusive.