- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 1,050
- SL Rez
- 2002
Just remember, most of us aren't 'people' to these assholes.... [in general]Welcome to our cyberpunk future:
Very little, I suppose, but each ballot has a barcode on it and once that barcode is scanned, the person whose name is on the ballot can no longer vote.Apparently not all states require an in-person application. For example, California's new law doesn't seem to require one. What stops a relative from simply using the documents mailed to them by the State of California?
Meanwhile, we here in the U.S. have pretty much crossed the 100,000 dead threshold due to the coronavirus. The article refers to it as a "surreal glimpse into a President's mind." I'm absolutely sickened by that view.In 50 years, Trump's weekend Twitter blasts may come across as a startling document of a presidency rooted more than ever in personal obsessions, and incessant wars with the media and his increasing throngs of political enemies.
There was little evidence of a deeper meaning to his presidency at this stage than personal and political grievances. Also missing is a more sweeping policy framework for a potential second Trump term. And other than a relentless push to support an aggressive opening of the country, for instance in a new demand for schools to open, Trump seems far less interested in how the task can be accomplished safely -- other than retweeting CDC hand washing advice -- than his boiling political feuds.
Not a problem at all. Yet some people want to encourage internet voting and I can rattle off a long list of how that can be manipulated on a large scale. Or just search vv for the Tom Scott videos about evoting.How many authenticated cases of such fraud have there been in the US in recent years? Is it a big problem?
In the 2018 election, one, in North Carolina. A republican candidate hired someone to "farm" votes - collect absentee ballots.How many authenticated cases of such fraud have there been in the US in recent years? Is it a big problem?
IIRC, this included filling them in, only letting people sign them.In the 2018 election, one, in North Carolina. A republican candidate hired someone to "farm" votes - collect absentee ballots.
Yeah, Adding extra helpings of speech on top of other speech isn't stifling speech.
Lol! Who wants to tell him free speech only applies to what governments can do. A private company can make any restrictions it wants as long as it does target a protected class.![]()
Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning
It is the first time the social media giant has said one of Donald Trump's tweets could be misleading.www.bbc.co.uk
ETA: and he's not a happy bunny
He's just representing his base. The people that shout "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" in completely inapplicable situations.Lol! Who wants to tell him free speech only applies to what governments can do. A private company can make any restrictions it wants as long as it does target a protected class.
Pff. It'd take massive election fraud for Trump to break even in California.
He's just upset that his 24/7 lie factory was challenged, and not even very well by Twitter. If it was my company I would have slapped it with a big "This is a lie" image rather than a rather weak-kneed, "Go look at this page" informational. But then, they've allowed him to lie incessantly for what, a decade now? Further, their refusal to completely wipe his baseless and disgusting tweet re: Scarborough is beyond the pale.![]()
Twitter tags Trump tweet with fact-checking warning
It is the first time the social media giant has said one of Donald Trump's tweets could be misleading.www.bbc.co.uk
ETA: and he's not a happy bunny
Of COURSE it was a Republican. Le sigh.In the 2018 election, one, in North Carolina. A republican candidate hired someone to "farm" votes - collect absentee ballots.