It's Brooklyn, not the Bronx.
Serious question. Is "Fox News' White Power Power Hour " really the name of a Fox News Show?
No. But Tucker Carlson is a white supremacist shitstain. Unfortunately, he is a broken clock that is occasionally right on some issues (non-intervention). I hate that she went there, she does herself no favors with the loyal Democratic base. But she's clearly appealing to Independents, that is where most of her support comes from, and a lot of Independents do watch Fox.
Well, no, I wouldn't call her a complete non-interventionist. But she wouldn't have gone into Libya to get rid of Gaddafi, she would not have supported the coup in Honduras, Etc. And I do believe that she has advocated for Congress to assume its role in the war making decisions, so I don't think that's quite right.
She's on the House Armed Services Committee and sits on the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee. I'd wager her security clearance exceeds all the other candidates.
None of them can realistically run as a third party candidate. Some important states have spoiler laws that would keep them off the ballot.
I'm not so sure - this spat she's having with Hillary Clinton is pretty much guaranteeing that a lot of people are taking a second look at her - especially all the people who went 3rd party or even voted for Trump last time around. All my Libertarian friend LOVE her for some reason...
None of that translates into her having any chance at the nomination - she's not above single digits in polling.
I don't think Tulsi ever had any intention of running as third party. I think there is some fear of where she is going to throw her support when she's finished in the primary. AOC and friends recent endorsement of Sanders isn't being celebrated by some factions of the party. The timing of this Clinton distraction is a bit suspect.
ftfy
Her anti-interventionist stance has a wide draw. I have libertarian friends that are looking at her too, people disgusted by Trump but hated Hillary Clinton.
