2020 Democratic Primary

Eunoli

SLU Cassandra
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,050
SL Rez
2002
Really that just makes Obama look bad.
At the time, it was a huge political risk. Yeah - Obama was slow on a lot of things and downright awful on other things - but he also made a lot of change and did things that made the country a better place to be. My life was saved by Obamacare the first year it was out - before the Republicans started gutting it - $30,000 hospital bill and I didn't pay a penny.
 

Lady Darnk Juniorette

⚧🎃💀Chaos Agent Forum Lord💀🎃⚧
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
2,395
SL Rez
2005
Joined SLU
Dec 2012
SLU Posts
9113
At the time, it was a huge political risk. Yeah - Obama was slow on a lot of things and downright awful on other things - but he also made a lot of change and did things that made the country a better place to be. My life was saved by Obamacare the first year it was out - before the Republicans started gutting it - $30,000 hospital bill and I didn't pay a penny.
I mean, ok, I'm glad you didn't have to pay that.

But I don't see what that has to do with Joes lagging on gay marriage.

And yes Obama did some good and I think Sanders is a better path to more than Joe is.
 
  • 1Eye Roll
Reactions: CronoCloud Creeggan

Eunoli

SLU Cassandra
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,050
SL Rez
2002
I mean, ok, I'm glad you didn't have to pay that.

But I don't see what that has to do with Joes lagging on gay marriage.

And yes Obama did some good and I think Sanders is a better path to more than Joe is.
I'm just saying that yes - he lagged - but he was central in getting it done when it did.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: Pamela

Katheryne Helendale

🐱 Kitty Queen 🐱
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
10,693
Location
Right... Behind... You...
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
October 2009
SLU Posts
65535
I guess I just see him as being just as old, and not promising much so won’t get any thing ‘more’ done than Sanders. I do see many abstaining from voting for DEMs if Sanders wins, but I also see there will Some not voting for them if it’s Biden. I can’t imagine many think Sanders will be able to change a whole lot if it’s him, but at least we know what he is aiming for, no? Apart from saying he isn’t for “revolutions”, what is Biden proposing?

It’s easy to keep promises when you don’t make many. Although, I might just not be aware of what he stands for. Apart from maybe punching trump, what is his vision for the next four years? I think I’ll have to go inform myself/listen more before continuing.. :p and let you all speak among yourselves.
You know, if those two were smart, then whichever one wins the nomination should tag the other as his VP. That would actually get both Democratic factions together, giving Trump a resounding boot out the door!
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Brenda Archer

Cristalle

Lady of the House
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
1,376
Location
Flori-duh
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
July 8, 2008
SLU Posts
2903
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
6,768
Location
NJ suburb of Philadelphia
SL Rez
2003
SLU Posts
4494



I guffawed.
She would have failed at that too. Cigarettes are not hot enough to ignite gasoline except under extraordinary circumstances. Lighters are though.

 

Veritable Quandry

Specializing in derails and train wrecks.
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
5,479
Location
Columbus, OH
SL Rez
2010
Joined SLU
20something
SLU Posts
42
You know, if those two were smart, then whichever one wins the nomination should tag the other as his VP. That would actually get both Democratic factions together, giving Trump a resounding boot out the door!
So if the one in his late 70s dies there is a guy in his late 70s ready to take over.
 

Cristalle

Lady of the House
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
1,376
Location
Flori-duh
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
July 8, 2008
SLU Posts
2903

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
24,412
SLU Posts
18459
Taken by the headline (though I still think the North Koreans' "dotard" is a better insult), I took a look at the article and discovered that I apparently shouldn't trust a word The Daily Beast says because its "corporate owner IAC has Chelsea Clinton on its board of directors" and that it published "an article titled “Kremlin Media Still Like Bernie, ’Cause They Love Trump” which aggressively smears Sanders as a tool of the Kremlin".

I'm not sure it says he's "a tool of the Kremlin" anywhere; rather, it says that commentators on Russia Today and Russian domestic TV channels (nominally independent but state-controlled in effect) keep promoting him as the most likely Democratic candidate -- I don't watch Russian domestic TV but I assume the Beast isn't making that up -- and that
It would be a mistake to think Bernie Sanders is by any means Russia’s “Manchurian candidate.” His value to the Kremlin is as a disrupting force whose candidacy benefits Trump. Presidential hopeful Tulsi Gabbard, who often appears on Fox News to criticize the Democrats, is perceived in the same light.
Furthermore, as it also notes,
In the 2016 U.S. presidential elections, Russian state media strongly backed both Sanders and Trump. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of the St. Petersburg troll farm, known as the Internet Research Agency (IRA) detailed how its operatives were instructed to “use any opportunity to criticize Hillary and the rest (except Sanders and Trump—we support them).”
(the actual quote is at para 43a, p 17, of the indictment).

While the Russians may well discover that they have completely misunderstood Sanders and that, in office, President Sanders proves their implacable opponent, all The Daily Beast is doing, it seems to me, is reporting on what Russian politicians and political commentators are doing now and on what they did 4 years ago.

Is there any reason to suppose Putin's preferences about US presidential candidates have changed since 2016 and he no longer wants to see a contest between Trump and Sanders, from which he hopes Trump will emerge the winner? Or should we, as Trump and the Republicans would like us to, dismiss Mueller's report as biased and unreliable?

Normally I wouldn't waste my time reading so obviously a partisan article, let alone checking its sources, but I thought we try here to quote from reliable news media when we can, and this piece seems to provide a good example why that's a good idea.

I'm not expressing any view on Bernie Sanders here, but I would suggest that his supporters are doing neither him nor themselves any favours when they quote such utter tripe in his support.
 
Last edited:

Aribeth Zelin

Faeryfox
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
4,140
SL Rez
2004
Joined SLU
03-11-2011
SLU Posts
9410
If somehow Biden gets the nomination and actually picks a republican as a running mate [unless its Romney - he sort of earned a modicum of respect], then there is no way in hell I'll vote for Biden, he can join Bloomberg.

Until the GOP becomes a sane party again, I -will- not vote for them. I'd rather just not vote on that individual race.