- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,938
- SLU Posts
- 18459
Quite possibly so, but what I'm saying is that such changes are the result of social and economic changes, not the voting system.France does not have PR. The national assembly is elected from 577 single member constituencies.
In countries without PR, far right movements exert influence by having the main party of the right adopt their policies. That is exactly what happened in Australia with the (il)Liberals adopting the immigration and refugee policies of One Nation, and in the UK with the Conservatives adopting Brexit and the same immigration and refugee policies the Liberals had adopted in Australia.
The far right have made considerable gains since 2000 in the US, the UK, most of the EU and much of the rest of the G20, regardless of the voting system. I'd say that this has multiple causes, among them the effects of the 2008 banking crisis and the pressures of irregular immigration caused worldwide by the climate crisis and political and social upheavals in many countries.
A country's voting system is, to my mind, an element in the political response to these pressures. It's not any sort of determinant. Adopting PR in the US and the UK might well be a good idea for various other reasons, but it would do little to affect the global economic and political forces that determine so much of a country's politics.




















