- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 5,818
- SL Rez
- 2002
- Joined SLU
- Nov 2003
- SLU Posts
- 35836
Former Gran Columbia, Venezuela through Equador, and Peru do a very smooth and non acidic coffee. My favourite way of taking it was introduced to me in Venezuela. Half very strong blond roast coffee made in an ordinary filter coffee maker and half hot full fat milk. (Cafe con leche.) The waiters in restaurants would walk around with a pot of coffee in one hand and a pot of hot milk in the other. Just point to your cup and they pour.I don't know Death Wish coffee. I'm more into trying out different blends of Columbian, or Kenyan, or Peruvian or whatever. Good Peruvian is pretty mellow (it really sounds as if I'm talking about a rather stronger stimulant, doesn't it?).
I wholly agree that racism plays a large part in the media antipathy towards Meghan. This incident, for example, prompted me to send quite a lengthy email of support to the lecturer, since I was so angry at the way Laurence Fox behaved![]()
Coming or going, Meghan gets the blame -- and it's because of her race
Suddenly, the message for the Duchess of Sussex has changed from "Why are you here?" to "Where do you think you're going?" And again, some observers think racism is partly to blame.www.cnn.com
It may be a gimmick but that gimmick let me talk my boss into buying it for the company so we're not stuck with Starbucks Burnt Roast in the lunchroom.ETA 2: I found this review of Death Wish -- he comments on how mellow it is, too, though overall he seems to think it's a bit of a gimmick. Deathwish Coffee Review
I think that's his point, though -- that you should drink it because it tastes good, not because it contains so much caffeine.It may be a gimmick but that gimmick let me talk my boss into buying it for the company so we're not stuck with Starbucks Burnt Roast in the lunchroom.
I have had co-workers comment that it's good but they can't take the caffeine. Haven't done formal double-blind tests except for "whoops forgot to label this carafe" which probably won't pass peer review.
I'm looking for a smooth, mellow coffee that has just the right amount of caffeine - not so much that it makes me feel I'm going to have an out-of-body experience. I prefer light to medium roasts.I think that's his point, though -- that you should drink it because it tastes good, not because it contains so much caffeine.
I'm ADHD and I'm self-medicating with caffeine, so he's wrong, that's a perfectly legitimate reason to drink it.I think that's his point, though -- that you should drink it because it tastes good, not because it contains so much caffeine.
It's a perfectly good reason to drink it, but it's not a great marketing line since it draws attention to a feature of the coffee that will be of particular interest to only a small section of the whole target market, because the number of people whose decisions about which coffee to buy are influenced primarily for the taste must surely be considerably larger than the number of people who are influenced by the high caffeine content.If you switch to a cone filter you can make whatever blend you want.
I'm ADHD and I'm self-medicating with caffeine, so he's wrong, that's a perfectly legitimate reason to drink it.
You would have a decent argument there except Starbucks has a hugely successful business selling over-roasted and just plain burnt coffee.It's a perfectly good reason to drink it, but it's not a great marketing line since it draws attention to a feature of the coffee that will be of particular interest to only a small section of the whole target market, because the number of people whose decisions about which coffee to buy are influenced primarily for the taste must surely be considerably larger than the number of people who are influenced by the high caffeine content.
I didn't see anything in that review where they compared or even measured the caffeine content. What's the caffeine content of those two Lavazza blends?Indeed, according to the review to which I linked, the strength of the blend, while certainly high, is nothing unusual, since it's only slightly stronger than two separate popular blends here, available in most major supermarkets as premium brands.
But that's not their selling point -- they seem to position themselves as being a fashionable place to drink coffee with lots of fancy flavours and toppings. Since I want to taste the coffee rather than flavourings, I've never actually used a Starbucks in my life, not because I deliberately avoid them but because I find two of their main, and equally ubiquitous, rivals here -- Caffe Nero and Costa Coffee -- sell perfectly reasonable coffee and are less expensive, so I use them if I'm not using my regular independent place.You would have a decent argument there except Starbucks has a hugely successful business selling over-roasted and just plain burnt coffee.
I tookI didn't see anything in that review where they compared or even measured the caffeine content. What's the caffeine content of those two Lavazza blends?
to mean that they're comparable.That's not saying we didn't realise that this thing is strong - strong enough to take on Geoff Capes before he took to budgerigar fancying - but it hides it well. It's right up there with the Hot Lava Java and Lavazza Espresso.
I LOVE Kona coffee! But good luck finding it outside of Hawaii. Oh yes, you can get coffee labeled Kona but good luck tasting any Kona in it. And what you do find is very expensive. I swear I think there's a secret law that prohibits it being sent off island. lol I spent a week staying in Kona for my son's wedding & my hotel had only Kona coffee. By the second cup I was ready to do anything necessary to get more. Before I left I stuffed packages of it in my suitcase & dumped a few things out to make room. Kona coffee = crack coffee!I've taken a liking to a couple of Hawaiian coffees that come in K-cups and don't cost very much. But they don't have much, if any, actual Kona beans in them. Kona, unfortunately, is prohibitively expensive.
The point is there's a huge market that doesn't give a damn about the taste, so advertising something else is perfectly rational.But that's not their selling point -- they seem to position themselves as being a fashionable place to drink coffee with lots of fancy flavours and toppings.
Unless they measured the caffeine they have no basis to claim they're comparable.I took to mean that they're comparable.
It's still twice as strong as the strongest coffee in that list that isn't advertising it's strength in the name, 3x stronger than the first name I recognize, and 6x stronger than the Starbucks entry. Whether you can get coffee that's about twice as strong doesn't change the fact that it's 150% your recommended maximum daily dose of caffeine in one cup. I think that counts as "high in caffeine".
I dunno. I would say, rather, there's a huge market that doesn't know what coffee is supposed to taste like. I wouldn't say that Starbucks don't sell on taste -- why else do they make such a selling-point out of the expensive flavourings they offer? I've seen all sorts of Starbucks adverts emphasising their different flavourings and toppings, but I don't recall seeing any that try to sell their coffees on the basis of their strength.The point is there's a huge market that doesn't give a damn about the taste, so advertising something else is perfectly rational.
Be that as it may, Death Wish's claim to be the world's strongest coffee clearly seems to be unfounded, and thus simply a piece of marketing hype, since if I want to buy really strong coffee, there appear to be several blends that are considerably stronger than Death Wish from which to choose on Amazon.Unless they measured the caffeine they have no basis to claim they're comparable.
It's still twice as strong as the strongest coffee in that list that isn't advertising it's strength in the name, 3x stronger than the first name I recognize, and 6x stronger than the Starbucks entry. Whether you can get coffee that's about twice as strong doesn't change the fact that it's 150% your recommended maximum daily dose of caffeine in one cup. I think that counts as "high in caffeine".
Also, mg/floz is a heck of a mongrel measurement.
I didn't parrot that claim. It *is* very strong, at the level where having the actual strongest coffee is academic.Be that as it may, Death Wish's claim to be the world's strongest coffee clearly seems to be unfounded, and thus simply a piece of marketing hype
You can buy Death Wish in Walmart.I want to buy really strong coffee, there appear to be several blends that are considerably stronger than Death Wish from which to choose on Amazon.