- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,118
- SLU Posts
- 18459
What Scott Adams' Deathbed Conversion Tells Us About Christianity
MAGA converts to MAGA
Putting on my serious and pedantic hat for a moment, I'm not sure I agree that anything any group of believers does can tell us anything about Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism or anything else, since I see generic terms like that as signifying something like "the whole set of beliefs and cultural practices of a body of people who say they're Christians" (or Jews or whatever), may of which are highly contentious within that body of people who so describe themselves.
Further than that I cannot go, since I can't comment on who is or who isn't a "real" Christian, and certainly not on who is or isn't a "real" Jew or a "real" follower of any other religion of which I have little knowledge or firsthand experience. Historical precedents for that kind of evaluation really aren't encouraging (wars of religion, the holy inquisition, etc).
So I don't like the headline, but I do agree with the general thrust of the article:
except that I'd rather he'd said "some Christians, " which to my mind would have been more accurate.In public discourse, Christianity is mostly presented as a force for good which cannot fail, though it can sometimes be failed. Thus, critics of Adams’ late Christian turn generally rebuke him for not understanding the religion, or for a lack of sincerity, just as christofascists are accused of violating the tenets of love and charity on which Christianity is (supposedly) based.
But Christianity is a 2000 year tradition with billions and billions of adherents across history. It does not have some sort of transcendent core or truth; it is in the end simply what Christians do and what Christians make it. And one thing that Christians do and make it is christofascism—a movement that sees Christianity as a violent white nationalist project and which worships hate.

























