Nobody Cares: PRS

[Ashiri]

Show me a government that doesn't dicker with and support its own agricultural industry.

Down Under, support is practically zero and some other countries effectively have negative subsidies.

 

[Katheryne Helendale]

Thread, up and down, about the Canada (really most if not all American truckers)" Freedom Convoy"

 

[Argent Stonecutter]

Last I checked Australia just supports coal mining.

 

[Kamilah Hauptmann]

 

[Innula Zenovka]

Reddit antifeminists absolutely lose it over a study finding that feminist men have more sex

Is this what a feminist looks like? We’re PLEDGE DRIVINGr! If you’re a fan of this blog, please help fund its continued existence by clicking the button below. THANKS! There are two things th…

www.wehuntedthemammoth.com

 

[Romana]

So that's why the botnet was going so hard to smear Hillary on Twitter last night and bowling for her blood. Something about the Durham Report (whatever that is, I forgot).
We're back to "lock her up" again.
I think Hills has too much sense to run again (and risk helping them land us with TFG again or a wannabe) and I can't see why she'd want to subject herself to all that again, but they think she's the power -mad would -be dictator.

 

[Innula Zenovka]

So the former guy's campaign will mainly be about re-litigating both the 2020 and the 2016 elections? Should be a certain winner.

 

[Romana]

And here's Tuckums with "but her emails" part LXVI (or so)

 

[WolfEyes]

Canada invokes unprecedented emergency measures — and triggers a political firestorm

The embattled Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has taken an enormous gamble to remove the truckers’ protests, and his legacy is on the line.

www.politico.com

 

[Innula Zenovka]

 

[Innula Zenovka]

 

[bubblesort]

Hate to say it, but I'm inclined to give Fox the benefit of the doubt on this one, because they were also the only ones screaming about it the last time it came out that a democrat wiretapped Trump in 2016. I mean, Obama said he 'unmasked' people in the Trump campaign, and I think boomers think unmasking is different from wiretapping because boomers are all brain damaged. If you secretly record somebody, with a microphone, you wiretapped them! In the end, I don't care what's legal and what's not, because our wiretapping laws are clearly unethical. Go ahead, accurately describe American surveillance laws to any average American, they will tell you that these laws are wrong. So Obama absolutely unethically used the power of the presidency to wiretap his the Republican presidential campaign, and Obama got away with it, because of corruption. Unfortunately, we don't have any Woodward and Bernsteins in 2022.

This Durham situation is just another example of the democratic party cheating to try to defeat Trump. Hillary was so pathetic, she couldn't even cheat her way to victory over Donald Trump. The only person who could defeat Trump was Trump himself, after he had already been in office for 4 years.

 

[WolfEyes]

Hate to say it, but I'm inclined to give Fox the benefit of the doubt on this one, because they were also the only ones screaming about it the last time it came out that a democrat wiretapped Trump in 2016. I mean, Obama said he 'unmasked' people in the Trump campaign, and I think boomers think unmasking is different from wiretapping because boomers are all brain damaged. If you secretly record somebody, with a microphone, you wiretapped them! In the end, I don't care what's legal and what's not, because our wiretapping laws are clearly unethical. Go ahead, accurately describe American surveillance laws to any average American, they will tell you that these laws are wrong. So Obama absolutely unethically used the power of the presidency to wiretap his the Republican presidential campaign, and Obama got away with it, because of corruption. Unfortunately, we don't have any Woodward and Bernsteins in 2022.

This Durham situation is just another example of the democratic party cheating to try to defeat Trump. Hillary was so pathetic, she couldn't even cheat her way to victory over Donald Trump. The only person who could defeat Trump was Trump himself, after he had already been in office for 4 years.

No we are not all brain damaged and you just royally pissed me off for the last time you sack of putrid dog shit eating pus.

 

[Katheryne Helendale]

Hate to say it, but I'm inclined to give Fox the benefit of the doubt on this one, because they were also the only ones screaming about it the last time it came out that a democrat wiretapped Trump in 2016. I mean, Obama said he 'unmasked' people in the Trump campaign, and I think boomers think unmasking is different from wiretapping because boomers are all brain damaged. If you secretly record somebody, with a microphone, you wiretapped them! In the end, I don't care what's legal and what's not, because our wiretapping laws are clearly unethical. Go ahead, accurately describe American surveillance laws to any average American, they will tell you that these laws are wrong. So Obama absolutely unethically used the power of the presidency to wiretap his the Republican presidential campaign, and Obama got away with it, because of corruption. Unfortunately, we don't have any Woodward and Bernsteins in 2022.

This Durham situation is just another example of the democratic party cheating to try to defeat Trump. Hillary was so pathetic, she couldn't even cheat her way to victory over Donald Trump. The only person who could defeat Trump was Trump himself, after he had already been in office for 4 years.

Every so often, your posts are actually passably reasonable. And then you come out of right field with this kind of insanely batshit-crazy diatribe... I have no words.

 

[Spirits Rising]

Every so often, your posts are actually passably reasonable. And then you come out of right field with this kind of insanely batshit-crazy diatribe... I have no words.

Had to double check on which of several posters you were meaning/responding to with this and ... Yes, that is normal for that one. The "passably reasonable" posts exist solely to mask the reality: The latter type is their actual "thought process"/norm.

 

[Beebo Brink]

I had to briefly reveal Ignored posts to confirm who you were talking about, as if I hadn't known already.

 

[bubblesort]

Had to double check on which of several posters you were meaning/responding to with this and ... Yes, that is normal for that one. The "passably reasonable" posts exist solely to mask the reality: The latter type is their actual "thought process"/norm.

ROFLMAO... yes, yes... you caught me! I'm only pretending to be a perfectly sane, well informed individual, but I'm really a member of the FIC, and I'm here to brainwash all of you, on behalf of my glorious reptile alien leaders! I'm going to convince all of you that the Mandalorian way is the only way, with my knowledge of secret things, that you can only find out about by reading nationally syndicated newspapers!

Every so often, your posts are actually passably reasonable. And then you come out of right field with this kind of insanely batshit-crazy diatribe... I have no words.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and be serious... there are a lot of ways to disagree with me, but most people here just want to call me names, and that's cool. I've been called worse by better and all that.

If you want to see what's wrong with this, without reaching all the way back to the context of the filthy politics that defined 2016 (like the unmasking)...

The main argument that the Durham situation is a tempest in a teapot, can be summed up in this tweet, which Romana linked to, earlier in this thread:

And here's Tuckums with "but her emails" part LXVI (or so)

I think we're all on the same page with that, right? They snooped on Trump's DNS requests, but that's ok, because DNS requests aren't 'substantive'.

That's just crazy. There is absolutely no world in which DNS results are not valuable to an attacker. Just looking at the traffic can tell you all you need to know about them for just about any attack you can imagine. You talk to anybody who has ever red teamed anything and they will tell you that you can profile an entire network just with the searches the technical people make. What hardware are they running? What firmware version? How about the OS? Did their last update go wrong? What's their favorite kind of food when they travel? What health issues do they have? What music do they like? It's absolutely insane how much you can get from that data. That's not even getting into things you might dig up on their stack overflow posts. Most technical people give away everything on stack overflow and quora.

If you think this is not substantive data, then you don't really know how a cyber attack is supposed to work, and that's ok. I know most people don't have a solid grasp on this kind of thing, and a lot of people take advantage of that situation. Maybe this will help...

I recently stumbled across a podcast that gets into how cyber attacks work, in great detail, from the perspective of an American government spook. I mean, I don't think this is actually how the government does things, but I do think that this is what the government wants us civilians to think about how they do things, which is still useful information to have. If you don't get all paranoid, run backups, change passwords, and reinstall windows, every time your computer crashes out, then you should probably listen to this. Instability is the first sign of many cyber attacks. You don't have to be crazy, but it's good to have a healthy level of paranoia.

Misadventures of a Nation State Actor – Darknet Diaries

In today's world of intelligence gathering, governments hack other governments. This episode takes you on a ride with a nation state actor to see exactly how it's done.

darknetdiaries.com

 

[Innula Zenovka]

Thread

 

[Katheryne Helendale]

ROFLMAO... yes, yes... you caught me! I'm only pretending to be a perfectly sane, well informed individual, but I'm really a member of the FIC, and I'm here to brainwash all of you, on behalf of my glorious reptile alien leaders! I'm going to convince all of you that the Mandalorian way is the only way, with my knowledge of secret things, that you can only find out about by reading nationally syndicated newspapers!



I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and be serious... there are a lot of ways to disagree with me, but most people here just want to call me names, and that's cool. I've been called worse by better and all that.

If you want to see what's wrong with this, without reaching all the way back to the context of the filthy politics that defined 2016 (like the unmasking)...

The main argument that the Durham situation is a tempest in a teapot, can be summed up in this tweet, which Romana linked to, earlier in this thread:



I think we're all on the same page with that, right? They snooped on Trump's DNS requests, but that's ok, because DNS requests aren't 'substantive'.

That's just crazy. There is absolutely no world in which DNS results are not valuable to an attacker. Just looking at the traffic can tell you all you need to know about them for just about any attack you can imagine. You talk to anybody who has ever red teamed anything and they will tell you that you can profile an entire network just with the searches the technical people make. What hardware are they running? What firmware version? How about the OS? Did their last update go wrong? What's their favorite kind of food when they travel? What health issues do they have? What music do they like? It's absolutely insane how much you can get from that data. That's not even getting into things you might dig up on their stack overflow posts. Most technical people give away everything on stack overflow and quora.

If you think this is not substantive data, then you don't really know how a cyber attack is supposed to work, and that's ok. I know most people don't have a solid grasp on this kind of thing, and a lot of people take advantage of that situation. Maybe this will help...

I recently stumbled across a podcast that gets into how cyber attacks work, in great detail, from the perspective of an American government spook. I mean, I don't think this is actually how the government does things, but I do think that this is what the government wants us civilians to think about how they do things, which is still useful information to have. If you don't get all paranoid, run backups, change passwords, and reinstall windows, every time your computer crashes out, then you should probably listen to this. Instability is the first sign of many cyber attacks. You don't have to be crazy, but it's good to have a healthy level of paranoia.

Misadventures of a Nation State Actor – Darknet Diaries

In today's world of intelligence gathering, governments hack other governments. This episode takes you on a ride with a nation state actor to see exactly how it's done.

darknetdiaries.com

Are you off your meds? I mean... are you?

 

[Kamilah Hauptmann]