- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,720
- SLU Posts
- 18459
It's not an either/or, though. The alternative to not getting your military involved in opportunistic wars for no good purpose is not to do away with your military but to use them rather differently.Obviously you and I have different world views. Regardless of Tulsi, I do not think it is healthy at all for the US to be killing people all over the world for oil and domination for many decades.
Furthermore, one of the problems about being a colonial power is that it's a good deal easier to acquire your empire by military superiority and quite another to hold it together. But cutting and running carries with it several problems, as we're seeing at the moment in Syria -- the Kurds have been betrayed by the US and forced to turn to Putin for protection, and Erdogan is turning into a very unpleasant regional strongman who's making a considerable nuisance of himself to NATO and the EU in order to warn them off intervening when he goes after the Kurds on the Syrian side of the Turkish border.
And all the while, we have Putin and his avowedly fascist advisors and lieutenants planning the division of the world into regional spheres of influence, with Continental Europe being absorbed into a Russian dominated Eurasia (they don't want us Brits, though).
I know I keep on banging on about it, but I really do recommend that people take a look at Timothy Snyder's The Road to Unfreedom. Putin and his circle make no secret of their political vision of Russia's destiny, drawn from explicitly fascist and Nazi Russian philosophers of the C20th, and the section of Snyder's book that deals with their published views is really pretty chilling, as is the section that deals with their published views on cyber warfare and propaganda (a war they seem to be winning hands down, I fear).












