- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 9,749
- Location
- Ohio
- Joined SLU
- 02-22-2008
- SLU Posts
- 16791
Ten bucks says his wife is only nominally liberal.Good heavens.
Ten bucks says his wife is only nominally liberal.Good heavens.
Twenty bucks says he is a stone cold crazy conspiracy theorist whose family can't wait to get far away from him.Ten bucks says his wife is only nominally liberal.
That's really sad, that you'd vote for an actual fascist who is harming this country over someone who has been serving for almost all her adult life, and whose policies mostly line up with yours.As a direct result of debates on this forum, I now know more about Tulsi Gabbard than I ever wanted to know. It's useless knowledge, or at least I hope it is, but it's insured that Gabbard is probably the only "Democrat" that would not get my vote if she was running against Trump. I think I'd take my changes with him, because she's bright enough to do even more damage than he would.
When you cry about how unfair it is that people keep calling you on your nonsense and then you try to gaslight everyone about how you never start personal shit, do you even realize when you do stuff like this it’s the definition of starting personal shit or are you so deluded that you don’t recognize your own behavior?That's really sad, that you'd vote for an actual fascist who is harming this country over someone who has been serving for almost all her adult life, and whose policies mostly line up with yours.
I didn’t say it was an “attack.“ I said you were provoking personal shit which you regularly pretend you don’t do when you cry about how you’re unfairly addressed on the forum.You are a real snowflake if you think that's an attack.
i mean, you could stop being an obnoxious prat while pretending you’re all impersonal and lily white, but I’m sure that‘s as likely as you giving up on posting conspiracies and misinformation.At this point there is no way I can say anything that you'd approve of, so I don't really care.
No one said you weren't allowed. What I’m pointing out is that you whine about how unfair it is that people address you personally. But you don’t acknowledge that you constantly initiate, snipe, and provoke personal escalations. You just play innocent and cry victim.We are all allowed to make observations on others' opinions.
There can be many points to a discussion forum, but I’m not talking about the forum. I’m addressing your hypocrisy.That's the point of a discussion forum.
Ahh. So things you say that irritate or insult other people don’t count, but things that I say do count and make me deliberately mean. How interesting.If I was trying to be deliberately mean, like you so often relish doing, it would be something else.
Keep telling yourself that.I'm neither a liar nor deluded.
Having a different view isn’t your problem. Being determined to drive your opinion down the throat of everyone that doesn’t share your opinion like some cheap evangelist is your issue.I just have a different point of view.
It’s dangerous to go alone.I just wonder what Gannons up to!
I think if you re-read what you just quoted from Beebo, you will see she says only that she wouldn't vote for Gabbard in a Trump v Gabbard election.That's really sad, that you'd vote for an actual fascist who is harming this country over someone who has been serving for almost all her adult life, and whose policies mostly line up with yours.
That changes nothing. I'm well aware that she'd otherwise vote blue no matter who. What I did was point out the reality that Gabbard's policy choices mostly align with hers, and yet she'd still vote for Trump, a fascist. It was not commentary on any other candidate.I think if you re-read what you just quoted from Beebo, you will see she says only that she wouldn't vote for Gabbard in a Trump v Gabbard election.
She didn't say anything about who she might vote for, or even whether she'd vote at all. She says only that it wouldn't be Gabbard.
Sorry, I must have missed the post where Beebo said she would vote for Trump. Not that she wouldn't vote for Gabbard but that she would actually vote for Trump or, indeed, anyone else at all.That changes nothing. I'm well aware that she'd otherwise vote blue no matter who. What I did was point out the reality that Gabbard's policy choices mostly align with hers, and yet she'd still vote for Trump, a fascist. It was not commentary on any other candidate.