- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,235
- SLU Posts
- 18459
The poor place has been through a lot.
As the highest court in the UK, the supreme court is usually the forum for proceedings of the utmost gravity. But last week, one hearing was momentarily interrupted by an unlikely and comic intervention.
As one legal professional addressed the bench, the voice of Tom Holland, host of the popular podcast The Rest is History, boomed out through the court’s microphone system, delivering a satirical impersonation of the late US president Jimmy Carter.
As proceedings were being recorded, the moment was captured and quickly circulated online. As the theme song plays and gets louder, the lawyer starts to laugh, while Lord Briggs, one of the judges, appears to look down at his phone.
“The Rest Is History. It was switched to silent, do carry on,” he said, prompting laughter in the courtroom.
The building is worth it to be restored.
The building is worth it to be restored.
Can you imagine the British parliament debating in a modern environment where every MP has a seat at their disposal? Like in the German Bundestag for instance, with electronic voting system and all that?
Nah..
I'm not sure that giving every MP a seat would be a good use of valuable floor space. Much of MPs' work is done in committee rooms or their offices (both of which could certainly use an upgrade, particularly the offices). The chamber itself is almost empty most of the time, and when individual members do attend the debate to raise a specific point the government minister responding generally promises either to write to them with an answer or to arrange a meeting to discuss it further.The building is worth it to be restored.
Can you imagine the British parliament debating in a modern environment where every MP has a seat at their disposal? Like in the German Bundestag for instance, with digital voting system, computers and all that?
Nah..
The more expensive option involves moving only the House of Lords out of the building while works that could take 61 years and cost £39bn are carried out.
The other proposed option was moving MPs and peers out of the Palace of Westminster for up to 24 years from 2032, under a refurbishment plan that could cost as much as £15.6bn.
Het Binnenhof is old, but not as original preserved as the Palace of Westminster and smaller. A lot has been modernized and added over the years to keep it functional as parliament and the other functions it had before that. 2.75 billion. Still a nice chunk of change.Only €2.75 billion?
The original Palace of Westminster was constructed in the C11th as a royal palace, but it's of course been rebuilt and modernised many times over the years. Much of it was destroyed by fire in 1834, and was rebuilt over 30 years, from 1840 to 1870, in a project that was beset by delays and cost overruns. I suspect we'll see the same thing happen this time. It also needed extensive repairs over 9 years after severe bomb damage in 1941.Het Binnenhof is old, but not as original preserved as the Palace of Westminster and smaller. A lot has been modernized and added over the years to keep it functional as parliament and the other functions it had before that. 2.75 billion. Still a nice chunk of change.