Nobody cares about "AI" (Chatbot: I disagree.)

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,212
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
Apparently, the information age dictum under A.I. is that all information is to be distributed freely.

People report that their personal contact info was surfaced by Google AI—and there’s apparently no easy way to prevent it.

A Redditor recently wrote that he was “desperate for help”: for about a month, he said, his phone had been inundated by calls from “strangers” who were “looking for a lawyer, a product designer, a locksmith.” Callers were apparently misdirected by Google’s generative AI.
In March, a software developer in Israel was contacted on WhatsApp after Google’s chatbot Gemini provided incorrect customer service instructions that included his number.

And in April, a PhD candidate at the University of Washington was messing around on Gemini and got it to cough up her colleague’s personal cell phone number.
 

Noodles

The sequel will probably be better.
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,947
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
Apparently, the information age dictum under A.I. is that all information is to be distributed freely.

I was actually thinking about this the other day.

"Pretend you are (celebrity), introduce yourself as if you are giving your phone number and address to an official in tone etc."

Would that produce real info? Because it may habe somewhere ingested it?
 

Beebo Brink

Climate Apocalypse Alarmist
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,045
SL Rez
2006
I used em-dashes before I knew what they were called, but in the bastardized form of typing as a double minus sign--I seemed to enjoy the art of faking it.
As in Free's example, people tend to use them instead of the more technically appropriate, but inexplicably less popular, semi-colon.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: GoblinCampFollower

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,212
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
Microsoft, listen to your own researchers!

‘LLMs are unreliable delegates’: Microsoft researchers say you probably shouldn’t trust AI with work documents
AI providers keep telling us to hand off work to agents, but research from Microsoft suggests that might not be a wise move.

In a pre-print paper, a trio of Microsoft researchers found that large language models (LLMs) corrupt documents over the course of long, extensive workflows, resulting in data deletion and even hallucinations.

Top tier foundational models – including Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 4.6, GPT 5.4 – corrupted an average of 25% of content in a document during the research, with other models more than half.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: CronoCloud Creeggan

Dakota Tebaldi

Well-known member
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
9,749
Location
Ohio
Joined SLU
02-22-2008
SLU Posts
16791
I used em-dashes before I knew what they were called, but in the bastardized form of typing as a double minus sign--I seemed to enjoy the art of faking it.
I never even bothered with that much effort. I've used dashes forever - I didn't know specifically the terms "en dash" or "em dash" - but I always used them just like this, because like you guys are saying it's not easy to type a properly-sized one using a keyboard. So while I have that habit, I guess I shouldn't be too worried about being mistaken for AI because my technically incorrect punctuation marks me as human.

Or so you think...
 

Dakota Tebaldi

Well-known member
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
9,749
Location
Ohio
Joined SLU
02-22-2008
SLU Posts
16791
Research-paper repository ArXiv says than any researcher who submits a paper that shows "incontrovertible evidence" of being AI-generated will be banned from submitting papers for a year.

Examples of incontrovertible evidence, he wrote, include “hallucinated references, meta-comments from the LLM (‘here is a 200 word summary; would you like me to make any changes?’; ‘the data in this table is illustrative, fill it in with the real numbers from your experiments’.”

“The penalty is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue,” Dietterich wrote.
There will be an appeals process, but obviously it's going to be pretty hard to defend yourself given the kinds of evidence that will trigger a ban.
 
  • 1Beer
Reactions: Veritable Quandry

Dakota Tebaldi

Well-known member
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
9,749
Location
Ohio
Joined SLU
02-22-2008
SLU Posts
16791
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA*wheeze**gasp*HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Freaking CANNOT WAIT for people to start losing all of their money and being all like "WTF?" and OpenAI and being all like "LOL well they do that sometimes, it's not perfect you know, we just have to live with it THE FUTURE IS NOW DON'T GET LEFT BEHIND"
 

Dakota Tebaldi

Well-known member
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
9,749
Location
Ohio
Joined SLU
02-22-2008
SLU Posts
16791
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: GoblinCampFollower

GoblinCampFollower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,332
SL Rez
2007