I pray that Trump makes the mistake of suing the Times about that article. There's a discovery process in such things that can be vastly revelatory.
IMO, they should not have used the term "suspect* tax schemes, but *illegal* tax schemes. We let far too many of these guys off the hook by softening the language. It's not that dissimilar from using really lax terms for our traitor king in the press. The NY Times, while I respect them for Watergate reveals and much of what is currently going on have a problem naming a crime for what it is,and further they promote bothsideism which I consider extremely detrimental to our democracy.
It's fine when both sides argue in good faith. That isn't what we have. We have one side arguing in good faith and the other out in Lalaland and far more likely Liarsville. It would be nice to return to some fabled time in which we just disagreed on issues, but that is NOT this time.
There isn't an honest discussion or debate. I see no reason to give voice to those intent upon destroying our democracy and taking all they can for themselves.
IMO, much of the press is still living in the time when they had to give both sides of an issue fair time. It was known as the FCC Fairness Doctrine. That was overturned in 1987 and we have Fox News as a result, not coincidentally. Nor is it coincidence that with the rise of that, a fairly large portion of the public has been brainwashed by the result.
Seriously, track the rise of Fox News with that overturn, enough so that they could argue in court that they present entertainment not news, though they purport to do so to their viewers.