Now they're saying that wearing or not wearing masks is political speech so a mask mandate violates the first amendment. WHAT THE ACTUAL FANCY ROTATING FUCK?
For some reason this legal argument reminds me of when an elderly gentleman was appearing in the local Crown Court, conducting his own appeal against a parking fine that the local magistrates had imposed, despite his explaining to them his theory that some Act passed during the reign of Queen Victoria entitled him to park where he liked, or at least where he was parked at the time the ticket was issued.
He explained his theory to the judge at quite some length, of course.
At the end of all this, the judge asked, fascinated,
"And you explained all this to the magistrates, did you?"
"Yes, your honour, I did."
"And what did they say?"
"Nothing, your honour. They fell about laughing. They just fell about laughing!"
On the other hand, if this makes hitting Nazis protected speech, too, I might be persuaded.
ETA: Of course, out of respect for the dignity of the court and the appellant's feelings, everyone in our court behaved with decorum and kept a straight face, but it wasn't easy!