- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,919
- SLU Posts
- 18459
Obviously I don't understand too well how US prosecutions like this work, but I wonder if, in a case like this, Unlawful Entry isn't the default charging offence which they can easily prove -- if the defendant has helpfully uploaded a selfie, then there's little argument about whether they were unlawfully inside the Capitol building -- and others can be added to the indictment as investigators interview the defendant and witnesses, examine the contents of the defendant's cellphone and social media accounts, and so on.![]()
DC police made far more arrests at the height of Black Lives Matter protests than during the Capitol clash | CNN
Washington, DC's Metropolitan Police Department made roughly five times as many arrests during the height of last June's Black Lives Matter protests compared to the US Capitol insurrection on Wednesday, a CNN analysis of the police department's data found.www.cnn.com
Far more were charged with felony rioting during the BLM protests. Many were charged with felony rioting, not the misdemeanor unlawful entry.
See also:
![]()
Rioters breached US Capitol security on Wednesday. This was the police response when it was Black protesters on DC streets last year | CNN
As hundreds of supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the US Capitol, breaking windows and wreaking havoc, politicians and activists were among the many who drew comparisons between the police response on Wednesday to that of last year's Black Lives Matter protests.edition.cnn.com
By the time the case is ready to come to trial, the defendant may be facing much more serious charges alongside unlawful entry.


















