Товарищ

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
24,038
SLU Posts
18459
That's an odd meme for two reasons.

First, when I read it, something felt vaguely and irritatingly off about it, quite apart from the politics -- like a rhyme that's a bit off, or a badly played note. Anyway, it plays off a false opposition "no one" vs "everyone", when really it should be "no one" vs "someone" (the opposite of there being no one at the door isn't there being everyone at the door, after all)..

So that's the first thing -- stupid political meme features obvious logical error, hold the front page.

The second one is the square tree -- what on earth is it doing there, completely obscuring the windows?

ETA: I'm all in favour of people owning homes like that if they can afford them, but only so long as they're all paying enough in taxes to help ensure decent and affordable housing for everyone who needs it.
 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
24,038
SLU Posts
18459

ETA: It's not a question of whether the chocolate is ethically sourced or not. It's a requirement of British law, and, it would seem, Australian law too, that companies are transparent about how they monitor their supply chains


As I understand it, most companies are quite content to comply with the legislation, at least in the UK -- the point about it is that doesn't place anyone at a competitive disadvantage by following best practice, and also it gives the business' buyers every reason to take a close look at how the products they source are manufactured.

The sellers can't simply say, "why does it matter, so long as we fulfill our side of the contact?"

I suppose it helps prevent the worst abuses, but I don't think anyone's hands are clean.

They can't be, given the conditions of mining, agriculture and production in many parts of the world, any more than they have been for the last several hundred years.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Kamilah Hauptmann