WTF Climate Change News

Chalice Yao

The Purple
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
459
Location
Somewhere Purple, Germany
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
Dec 2007
SLU Posts
9108
I figured this fits in here:


This new study, which looks at four specific chemicals in the class, suggests that levels of one PFAS in rainwater around the globe often "greatly exceed" US drinking water advisory levels.
Soil around the world is similarly contaminated, evidence suggests.
The study's findings lead the authors to conclude that a planetary boundary has been crossed - that there simply is no safe space on Earth to avoid these substances.
"We argue here that we're not within this safe operating space anymore, because we now have these chemicals everywhere, and these safety advisories, we can't achieve them anymore," said Prof Ian Cousins, the lead author from Stockholm University.
"I'm not saying that we're all going to die of these effects. But we're in a place now where you can't live anywhere on the planet, and be sure that the environment is safe."

TL;DR: You can be in the most remote location on earth, and still get to enjoy chemically contaminated water on top of the microplastics you can't avoid anymore.
We are at that point in time, right now.
 
Last edited:

Aribeth Zelin

Faeryfox
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
4,140
SL Rez
2004
Joined SLU
03-11-2011
SLU Posts
9410
I figured this fits in here:





TL;DR: You can be in the most remote location on earth, and still get to enjoy chemically contaminated water on top of the microplastics you can't avoid anymore.
We are at that point in time, right now.
Maybe that explains why the GM page says they are aiming to completely convert their vehicles to electric asap.... the people in charge realize they aren't just ruining the world most of us live in, but that they live in too.... ;.;
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Sid

Archer

Not a Robot
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
704
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
2007
Massive, Unregulated Source of Plastic Pollution That is Killing the Planet

A nurdle is a bead of pure plastic. It is the basic building block of almost all plastic products, like some sort of synthetic ore; their creators call them “pre-production plastic pellets” or “resins.” Every year, trillions of nurdles are produced from natural gas or oil, shipped to factories around the world, and then melted and poured into molds that churn out water bottles and sewage pipes and steering wheels and the millions of other plastic products we use every day.
Nurdles are not classified as pollutants or hazardous materials, so the Coast Guard, which usually handles cleanups of oil or other toxic substances that enter waterways, bears no responsibility for them.
Likewise, most state governments have no rules in place around monitoring, preventing, or cleaning up nurdle spills
 

Katheryne Helendale

🐱 Kitty Queen 🐱
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
10,464
Location
Right... Behind... You...
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
October 2009
SLU Posts
65534

Soen Eber

Vatican mole
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
3,959
IMHO Part of the behaviour exhibited here is the vacuum in the top of the closed container slowing down the flow, as it does when emptying an inverted bottle. I'd be more convinced with this demonstration if the if the containers were open-topped.
You'd have to remove the sides, too. Oops! Water runs off, doesn't soak in. Your shoes get wet! But they don't get wet (or as wet) in the other soils because the water soaked in. [inserts philosorapture meme].
 

Arkady Arkright

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
814
You'd have to remove the sides, too. Oops! Water runs off, doesn't soak in. Your shoes get wet! But they don't get wet (or as wet) in the other soils because the water soaked in. [inserts philosorapture meme].
You could see the bubbles of air rising in the water, the same effect as if you up-end a narrow-necked bottle, so the vacuum does have some effect. I'm not saying that what's being demonstrated is incorrect, just that there are other factors influencing the result that could have been excluded from the demonstration..
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Tirellia

Tirellia

Cold and Wet
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
424
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
2014
SLU Posts
320
You could see the bubbles of air rising in the water, the same effect as if you up-end a narrow-necked bottle, so the vacuum does have some effect. I'm not saying that what's being demonstrated is incorrect, just that there are other factors influencing the result that could have been excluded from the demonstration..
Agreed. A series of simple tubes filled with water would be more reasonable.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Arkady Arkright

Soen Eber

Vatican mole
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
3,959
You could see the bubbles of air rising in the water, the same effect as if you up-end a narrow-necked bottle, so the vacuum does have some effect. I'm not saying that what's being demonstrated is incorrect, just that there are other factors influencing the result that could have been excluded from the demonstration..
My own belief is the closed tubes are more accurate, as they remove the factor of gravity in measuring a soil's ability to absorb moisture. The dryer soil is more packed down, meaning there is less surface area to exchange air for water, while healthier soil is looser and has more surface area to work with.

It's a good question though. I'll look around for someplace to get a more informed answer.