Romana
The Timeless Child
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2018
- Messages
- 5,097
- SL Rez
- 2010
All this is doubtless true, but I don't see how any of it makes the the relationship between Chinese capitalists and those who alienate their labour to them significantly different to the relationship between British, German or American capitalists, except insofar as local laws on how capital treats labour (whether within the domestic jurisdiction or outside it) any different.You are sidelining the discussion. I am not talking here about the wrong-doings of the PRC, nor its government, mainly about the economic side of life.
Of course there are wrong-doings at large in China. Tibet for example, which is still for me the main one. The Uigurs, and many many more.
But the European states are in no good position to criticise that, because at the end of the day most European states are morally not better than China is. Let's just take for example the refugee camps on Lesbos, Greece. Why are these there? Because most member states of the EU refuse to take the refugees in, like it is their contractual duty. Or let's talk about the refugee boats an the Mediterrenean sea, and how many deaths there are every year and how many states are nowadays refusing to let refugee rescue ships into a harbour. Human rights of refugees mean in the EU nothing if it might cost votes, that's the plain truth.
How about the deal with Erdogan, which is basically bribing him with billions of Euros so that he keeps the refugees in Turkey and does not open the flood gates to the west?
Or how about Australia and it's "No, you won't make Australia your home" campaign?
And the USA got Guantanamo, and a list of meddling in the interior affairs of foreign states several pages long, including rightfully elected head of states, that there's a whole Wikipedia article only dedicated to that and Noah Chomsky once called it the "number one rogue state ever."
And most importantly: why did China became so wealthy? Because we were so drunk on exporting our jobs there, that's why, more importantly because that's how unregulated capitalism and "free trade" works. And if economy would really have an ethic compass we would have stopped doing business with China long ago. But we are still feeding the dragon, so we've got no right to complain about that, because basically we are supporting that in indirect ways as well every single day. Because there's money to make, it's still an emerging market where you can sell millions of stuff. Money, money, money!
China knows all about our shortcomings, and when you try to criticise them, well, you've got to hear "first fix your own inhuman stuff before you come critisising us." Which happens often enough by the way. There's the Chinese term 百年國恥, which means "century of humiliation."
It refers to the time frame from the first Opium War in 1839 to the founding of the end of WWII. Basically it's their sum of experiences with major Western powers, British Empire, France, USA, Germany. And the result of it is that the Chinese have a deeply rooted distrust against the West, it's their national shame and trauma, because they know from first hand experience that Western promises and actions are normally totally different things, and since generations they're sworn to never let that happen again. Also to never bow down their head to the West again as well. They want to be the center of power in their region again, like they've been for hundred of years before the 19th century, and work towards that goal with no compromise.
"Throw more money at it" didn't work, so maybe it's time for "Hi, we also don't respect human rights, and we're here to help".And look who in the mean time openly embraces the Taliban and shows up in Kabul... one of its neighboring countries, China.
For the time being is the key phrase here. I'll give them two years, five at most, before there is a strong guerrilla that is doing to the Taliban what the Taliban did to the old regime....
and they're prepared to go along with the Taliban for the time being
...
Aside from saying they'll respect women's rights, they also day they won't take revenge.But how many extra lives in Afghanistan will be ruined or ended premature now due to the revenge thoughts of the Taliban, only because America and its western allies wanted to take out Bin Laden?
Most likely far more than ever died in the tragic 9.11 events.
Not sure they even can "mean it" because they have no idea what "it" is. They probably don't think they ever did not respect women's rights. They don't know the concept.Aside from saying they'll respect women's rights, they also day they won't take revenge.
![]()
The Taliban Claim They'll Respect Women's Rights — With Their Reading Of Islamic Law
The militants' spokesman doubled down on their efforts to convince the world that it has changed and that it will not seek to take revenge.www.npr.org
We'll see if they mean it.
He'll go to his grave without really knowing this was his fault.I can't believe W crawled out of his hole to make a statement on this. Between this and Iraq, he's lucky we don't send him and his buddies to the Hague.
Corrected.He'll go to his grave without really knowing.
What China is doing in Afghanistan? Preparing for mining, of course... and since both countries are sharing a border they could even build a train network for it.The western powers have lots of baggage due to their history with Africa, Asia, and the Middle-East. Centuries of colonialism, and in some places slavery. It is not that surprising that many non-western countries do not trust the west. It is unknown what China will do, but China does not have any history of intervention except for border wars with its closest neighbors in Asia. This gives China a relatively "free hand" in much of the world.
Ah, Pence, the little far-right turd that was Trumps' henchman / VP all along... He's a fine one to talk.Thread :