- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,750
- SLU Posts
- 18459
I think PMs and US Presidents are in a rather different position, since the President serves as a result of the electoral college vote, while the PM is appointed by the monarch on the basis that she or he is able to command a stable majority in Parliament.All presidents and prime ministers should have to pass a medical at regular intervals. And it should be an independent board, not their personal physicians, that administers the medical.
As Liz Truss and Boris Johnson both demonstrated, as did Margaret Thatcher rather less recently, when the ruling party loses confidence in the PM for whatever reason, the PM is replaced pretty quickly.
Replacing the US President on the grounds of ill-health, at least if they don't want to be replaced, is a rather more complex process, since it involves invoking the 25th Amendment, which can be done unilaterally by the Vice President and 8 cabinet officials but, if the President doesn't want to be removed, it takes a two thirds majority in both houses to confirm the removal. Otherwise a potentially rather aggrieved President is automatically returned to office.
I don't see how such a measure would remove Donald Trump if, God forbid, things go sideways in the election or the electoral college, and I don't see it's necessary in the UK, where the last PM to serve while incapacitated was, I think, Winston Churchill during his final term in office.














