detrius
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 2,368
- Location
- Land of bread, beer and BMW.
- Joined SLU
- 09-30-2007
- SLU Posts
- 10065
The plan doesn't have to be practicable in its entirety to become a criminal act.We don't know what the evidence against the two men is, but the bar to conviction for conspiracy in Texas seems to be pretty low
If that's correct, the prosecution needs to prove three elements beyond reasonable doubt
Your example clearly doesn't meet those criteria, but I can just about see how, depending on the evidence, a jury might be persuaded the pair are guilty, even though their plan was clearly pretty fanciful.
- Agreement (mutual agreement to commit a crime)
- Intent (intent to commit the crime)
- Overt act towards committing the crime (can be something as simple as purchasing supplies)
I've often wondered, as a general point, how practicable a plan has to be in order for it to become a criminal act.
For example, if someone tries to kill their victim by adding what they believe is arsenic to the victim's coffee, then that's attempted murder even though the substance they add is, in fact, harmless (they bought what they thought was arsenic from an undercover police officer who supplied them with sugar, maybe).
Where, though, does this leave someone who sincerely believes in traditional African religions or vodoun who makes what they believe is a serious attempt to kill someone by paying a sorcerer to place a curse on them?
Most of us wouldn't believe that the curse could have any effect (and if the victim did, in fact, die, we'd dismiss the curse as purely coincidental) but would not the defendant and the sorcerer nevertheless be guilty of attempted murder, if they both intended the curse to kill the victim and believed it would?
In this case, although it's unlikely that they would have succeeded in taking over the island, it's entirely reasonable to assume they would have ended up killing people before being stopped.
It's the same with all these killers who dreamt of starting a "race war", like Manson or Breivik. The fact that their race war didn't materialize doesn't make the murders they committed less of a criminal act.
This isn't the first time some American white supremacists were planning to take over an island in the Caribbean.
For example, there was "Operation Red Dog" in the 1980s, when a bunch of American and Canadian Nazis and KKK members tried to overthrow the government of Dominica.
The Confederate States of America also had imperialist plans for taking over Latin America, which probably are the point of origin for these delusions.
The oppression of Cuba in the early 20th century is also a precedent for (state sanctioned) military adventurism. America has a pretty bad habit of letting people with money take over islands and do whatever they want.















