Until Jesus returns and starts telling us otherwise, we're literally stuck with self-designation as the only way to accept who a Christian is.
Official records don't have him saying anything to which he could say something 'otherwise' to about same sex relations. At all. And given that he basically 'Fulfilled the Law' of the old testament (whatever the fuck that really means) and created a 'new covenant', which either does or doesn't supplant the prior covenant... I swear, the whole 'from a contradiction, anything follows' it's as if the bible were written to allow anyone to claim it supports *anything*. Including slavery and lynching.
Other than the implication that Jesus cured a centurian's 'pais' sight unseen [(pais from Greek, meaning "child," "boy," or "servant") historically refers to a young attendant, slave, or son in ancient Greek contexts, often denoting someone subordinate.] which given what's known about historic greek culture cultural norms, that role could very well have been a sexual one as well.
And Jesus's singling out his love for 'John the Apostle' telling treated Mary to treat him as her own son. As if the two were brothers, or perhaps more.
To any person with a shred of christ-like compassion, it seems clear that gays and transgender individuals would have been welcome at the table along with the sex workers and tax collectors.
And the pharisees claiming to know better would have their god damned tables flipped.
... if any of it were real at all. Which I doubt, but I like to insist that fictions remain internally consistent.
/rawr_post_coffee_morning_rant