Kamilah Hauptmann
Shitpost Sommelier
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 15,072
- Location
- Cat Country (Can't Stop Here)
- SL Rez
- 2005
- Joined SLU
- Reluctantly
When you go into the privacy settings on your browser, there’s a little option there to turn on the “Do Not Track” function, which will send an invisible request on your behalf to all the websites you visit telling them not to track you. A reasonable person might think that enabling it will stop a porn site from keeping track of what she watches, or keep Facebook from collecting the addresses of all the places she visits on the internet, or prevent third-party trackers she’s never heard of from following her from site to site. According to a recent survey by Forrester Research, a quarter of American adults use “Do Not Track” to protect their privacy. (Our own stats at Gizmodo Media Group show that 9% of visitors have it turned on.) We’ve got bad news for those millions of privacy-minded people, though: “Do Not Track” is like spray-on sunscreen, a product that makes you feel safe while doing little to actually protect you.
Someone must have.Apparently Youtube was down for about an hour Tuesday night. Anyone notice?
Can Alexa be set up so I could clap on, clap off?I finally found a use for the smart plug I got on Amazon Prime day for $10.
I bought a small Vornado fan for my office to help circulate air, and I plugged into into the smart plug, so I can say "Alexa turn on fan" and I can also control it from my phone.
https://www.amazon.com/Kasa-Smart-Wi-Fi-Plug-TP-Link/dp/B0178IC734
OK, but how did they do the science...A presentation at a gastroenterology conference in Vienna this week reported the preliminary results of a pilot study looking at fecal samples, finding nine different kinds of microplastics in the samples they analyzed. The news has attracted a lot of media attention, but the study is so small that it’s worth viewing it cautiously instead of drawing solid conclusions from it.
Concern about plastic in the human food supply has been a hot topic for some time, with tiny particles from broken-down plastics being found in food, drinks, and even the air. If we’re taking plastic in on one end, and we can't digest it, it’s expected and logical that we’d see it on the other end, too. But expectation isn’t the same thing as actual evidence, and this study is the first to present evidence of those microplastics in the human gut.
Gastroenterologist Philipp Schwabl and his colleagues asked their participants to keep a food diary for a week before packaging up their poop in a plastic-free sample kit and shipping it to Vienna.

Why?But the idea of typing out "Who was the 39th President of the United States?" when you could just type "39th US president" and get the exact same answer seems bizarre to me.