Nobody Cares about TV and Film

Argent Stonecutter

Emergency Mustelid Hologram
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,436
Location
Coonspiracy Central, Noonkkot
SL Rez
2005
Joined SLU
Sep 2009
SLU Posts
20780
Manos isn't Manos without Torgo wearing his satyr costume backwards and destroying his knees and committing suicide.
 
  • 1lolwut?
  • 1LOL
Reactions: bubblesort and Govi

Noodles

The sequel will probably be better.
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,955
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
$60/year is more than Paramount+ and Peacock I think.

Doesn't Warner own CNN? Why isn't this just packed in with HBO?
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: bubblesort

Argent Stonecutter

Emergency Mustelid Hologram
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,436
Location
Coonspiracy Central, Noonkkot
SL Rez
2005
Joined SLU
Sep 2009
SLU Posts
20780
Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Govi

bubblesort

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
Messages
1,990
I just picked up Paramount+ Preimum for $2 a month for the first 3 months. I really only got it for that deal, because I think I'm going to be rotating around streaming services every few months anyway, and Paramount doesn't have that much content that I find interesting. I don't care about star trek or their copaganda procedurals. Live local TV is nice, and they have a lot more streaming channels than I thought they would. The comedy central content might be nice, too.

One thing that annoys me, though, is that my ad blockers in Firefox stop live video from the local TV station from playing. The regular subscription deal was $1 a month, but I paid the extra dollar a month for ad free service. I totally get that live tv is going to have commercials, even with plus premium, but at the same time, if my ad blockers are stopping the content from playing, then that means the Paramont+ service is putting more ads on top of the ads I would normally get watching this channel with an antenna. That's some bullshit.
 

Argent Stonecutter

Emergency Mustelid Hologram
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,436
Location
Coonspiracy Central, Noonkkot
SL Rez
2005
Joined SLU
Sep 2009
SLU Posts
20780
They're probably overlaying the local ads with their ads.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: bubblesort

bubblesort

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
Messages
1,990
They're probably overlaying the local ads with their ads.
IDK, I tried watching the local news and they showed me 5 solid minutes of commercials, then some tabloid crap of some woman dramatically describing living in a crack house. I'm not bougie enough to get off on that crap. Basically, they threw ads at me and then didn't show me what I asked for. They do have a bunch of channels, and that's nice, but they don't actually show you what's going to be on. The TV guide only scrolls what's presently playing, and I just learned it lies, so that part of the service is useless.

Aside from that, I've been clicking around on Paramount, and I honestly think Paramount+ has got to be the worst streaming service I've tried so far. I've either had or currently have Netflix, Prime, Hulu, Disney+, HBO Max, Discovery+ (my GF is into fish documentaries), and a bunch of free services like Tubi. I'm not exactly sure what makes a good streaming service yet, but I think I can look at Paramount+ to see what makes a terrible service.

First of all, when I scroll the content, every single row of graphics shows me the same things: Star Trek (especially Picard), FBI, Bull, and NCIS. If you don't want the Star Trek reboots, or copaganda, you're gonna have to scroll a bit to find something to watch.

They do have Smithsonian Channel docs, but I think every single service I've tried has a section for Smithsonian docs. It's like intergalactic law that all streaming services have Smithsonian.

The classic nickelodeon stuff is nice. Who doesn't want to watch old episodes of Double Dare and Ren & Stimpy? Also, the MTV stuff is good, but it doesn't actually have a lot of the classic MTV stuff that the MTV generation grew up with. You can see Aeon Flux and Celebrity Death Match, but there are only 10 episodes of Beavis & Butthead, and none of them show them making fun of any music videos. They don't have Headbangers Ball or Yo MTV Raps. If you are nostalgic for that kind of stuff, you will have better luck on the Pirate bay. Aside from half a dozen classic MTV shows, the rest of their MTV content is reality TV, which is garbage. Nobody wants to pay extra to stream that crap. The only reason it exists is because stupid boomers are too hooked on brain-rotting TV to go anywhere else for entertainment, so they have a captive audience of morons. Chord cutters are always going to see reality TV as inferior, and that inferiority reflects on the quality of the streaming service.

They do have some interesting late night shows. Colbert is good, and Trevor Noah is good, but if they do anything worth watching, you can usually see it for free on YouTube. They also have James Corden, if you like watching an awkward englishman sing off key while they drive (I do support immigration, but just this once, can we please send him back to the UK?)

The absolute worse part, though, is the ads. Before every single show, there are at minimum two ads, and the first ad is at minimum a minute long. They are unskippable. If you have ad blockers, or a VPN, nothing will run, so you can't block their ads. High quality services like HBO and the free tier of Peacock have no problem with my ad blockers or VPN (I use PIA), but Paramount absolutely will not run without ads.

To re-iterate: I bought the ad-free tier!

To be fair, I did only pay $2 a month for the first month, so trying Paramount+ was not an expensive mistake I'm just going to cancel them and move on. I don't understand how they thought this product would be acceptable enough to push the service hard with superbowl commercials like they did.

So the content is lame, but the library is actually larger than Hulu's. If you combined the size of Disney+'s and Discovery+'s libraries, that library would still be smaller than Paramount+'s library. So their library size is decent! It's just the absolute bottom of the barrel, quality-wise. This is a prime example of how library size does not correlate with quality of a streaming service.

I think I'll try Peacock next, because it's the only streaming service I haven't tried yet, and I was going to get it for a couple of months anyway, because they are about to do American Eurovision (officially named American Song Contest), and Eurovision. American Eurovision premieres in a couple of weeks, and Eurovsion premieres after that.
 

Lexxi

meow
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
1,331
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
12-14-2007
SLU Posts
6381
I've never seen any ads on Paramount+. Granted, I've only watched Star Trek shows, 1883, Cheers and . . . I think others, but can't recall at moment. Never tried to watch whatever "local" refers to. Didn't know they had local on Paramount+.

I think the only time I've seen commercials on a streaming services was way back in the early days of Hulu when they'd air the network shows a day or two after it aired on TV; and on ESPN+.

I've never gotten Peacock to work on my TV, so I think I only watched one episode of one show on my laptop before forgetting I'm subscribing to their free service.

Let's see. I have:
Apple+: For All Mankind; Foundation; Invasion; Mythic Quest; Ted Lasso; Central Park; Acapulco; Greyhound; Finch; The Morning Show (1st episode); See (saw 1st season & 1st ep of 2nd season, but can't stand main villain, so can't continue; Schmigadoon;

BritBox: Traces (1st episode); Cadfael (1st 2 episodes); A History of Ancient Britian;

Disney+: Book of Boba Fett; Mandalorian; Hawkeye; WandaVision; The Right Stuff; The Falcon and the Winter Soldier; Loki; Star Wars: The Bad Batch; Monsters at Work; What If?; Luca; Soul; Mulan; Raya and the Last Dragon; Cruella; Black Widow; Jungle Cruise;

HBO Max: The King's Man; Peacemaker; Ghosts (UK version); Westworld; Batman: The Animated Series; Doom Patrol; The Nevers; Rome; Entourage;

Hulu: Only Murders in the Building; 11.22.63; Boss Level; Dollhouse;

Netflix: on which I watch(ed): Space Force.The Good Place. Disenchantment. Don't Look Up. The Last Kingdom (1st 3 episodes). Lost in Space. Comedians in Cars getting Coffee. Bridgerton. Red Notice. Lucifer. Kingdom. Wu Assassins.

Paramount+: 1883; Star Trek: Discovery; Star Trek: Lower Decks; Star Trek: Picard; Star Trek Prodigy (1st 4 episodes); Hannibal - Marsch auf rom; The Bureau of Magical Things;

Prime: The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel; Reacher; Voyage of the Continents; The Wheel of Time; The Boys; The Man in the High Castle; Jack Ryan; The Tick; Jean-Claude Van Johnson; Comrade Detective; Upload; Invincible; Coming 2 America; The Tomorrow War; The Americans;
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
Reactions: Romana and bubblesort

Romana

The Timeless Child
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
5,097
SL Rez
2010
Reading Lexxi's post and thinking, "oh yeah, I've got to watch that, and that, and that..."
Most of them are on my list. I don't have Paramount Plus, and I can't add another streaming service just now, so that will have to wait.
But that's OK,I've got a long enough list now, lol.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions: Lexxi

Beebo Brink

Climate Apocalypse Alarmist
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,048
SL Rez
2006
My love for Kristen Bell kept me watching The Woman Across the Street from the Girl in the Window (Netflix) long after I should have bailed. I kept thinking there was no possible way that an actor of Bell's calibre would waste her time on what appeared to be a story of ludicrous, mind-blowing stupidity. Surely, SURELY there must be some twist ending that would upend the cloyingly improbable story into some clever creative sleight-of-hand.

Nope. It really was exactly that astoundingly stupid.

The foundation of the first season (this is not a spoiler, unless -- like me --you expected competent writing) is that Anna (Kristen Bell) is the mother of a young daughter who died (I'M NOT KIDDING, THIS IS REALLY THE BACKGROUND STORY) because she accompanied her father on Bring-Your-Child-To-Work-Day. He was a prison psychiatrist, and little Elizabeth happily trotted into a maximum security prison, and took a seat in a psych session with a known mass murderer. The prison warden interrupts them and pulls her father aside, just outside the cell, and carelessly lets the door lock behind them. At which point the mass murderer kills and eats the little girl in front of them.

Elizabeth is shattered by this "tragic" (aka completely improbable) incident and over the next few years descends into alcoholism and drug addiction. Oddly, however, her (now ex) husband is only mildly perturbed, keeping his equanimity with admirable aplomb FOR A MAN DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GHASTLY DEATH OF HIS OWN DAUGHTER. Fortunately for him, Anna blames herself rather than him. BECAUSE OF COURSE SHE WOULD, that's how you know that beneath her drunken dysfunctional behavior beats the heart of a fundamentally good woman.

Unbelievably, the series goes downhill from there with a spate of unsolved murders, in circumstances not quite an improbable as the death of her daughter, but damn close. You wouldn't think the writers could actually top the show's backstory for sheer unbelievable stupidity, but they do. I won't bother with spoiler info, because I should never have finished watching the damn thang and know how it ends. Absolutely nothing that followed was reality-based on any number of levels, and the final gorefest "revelation" was so over the top that it would have made a marvelous SNL skit. As drama, the horror is that someone thought the ending was a good idea.

The final episode tidied up the murderous mayhem with roses, lollipops, unicorns and rainbows, then set up the premise for season two. I've learned my lesson, however. I won't be watching the delectable Ms. Bell again, at least not in this show.
 
Last edited:

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,228
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565

NyteWytch

What's good, Miley?
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
250
Location
Hell
SL Rez
2004
Joined SLU
Dec 2010
SLU Posts
1138
My love for Kristen Bell kept me watching The Woman Across the Street from the Girl in the Window (Netflix) long after I should have bailed.
I actually enjoyed this but I knew going in that it was a campy, parody of sorts for this genre. I guffawed (probably not where appropriate) and hooted during several silly scenes. It was def the escapism I needed at the time and will def look for the next season. But i definitely can see where it won't be everyone's gigantic glass of wine.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Beebo Brink

Beebo Brink

Climate Apocalypse Alarmist
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,048
SL Rez
2006
I actually enjoyed this but I knew going in that it was a campy, parody of sorts for this genre. I guffawed (probably not where appropriate) and hooted during several silly scenes. It was def the escapism I needed at the time and will def look for the next season. But i definitely can see where it won't be everyone's gigantic glass of wine.
As a parody, yes, it would be really really funny. But the tone was off. They played it like a straight-up drama (albeit made by Hallmark). Maybe I just wasn't in the mood to view it otherwise, but for me, they missed the comedic edge by a mile.

Thanks for the perspective though. It makes more sense to me as a failed comedy than as a failed drama.
 

Veritable Quandry

Specializing in derails and train wrecks.
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
5,297
Location
Columbus, OH
SL Rez
2010
Joined SLU
20something
SLU Posts
42
This theater doesn't regularly change its projector bulbs and it shows.
Mrs Quandry complained in depth about the dark, muddy tones. We knew it wasn't the theater's fault, but moviegoers will usually expect more brightness.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: bubblesort

Lexxi

meow
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
1,331
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
12-14-2007
SLU Posts
6381
Oh. The DARKNESS darkness. I was thinking what was meant was that the movie was dark, not that the topic was about how dark the movie was.

Film didn't seem to have darker lighting, at least not as dark as I'd expect for a DC film. Dark lighting, yes, just not as dark as some of the DC films. Or as dark as some episodes of Game of Thrones. Some of those episodes were reportedly shot in pitch darkness without any lighting.

They probably shouldn't have had the first shot of Batman with his mask off, in the film, with him still having the black stuff around his eyes. My immediate thought was "they've gone "Emo-Batman" and/or "Goth-Batman" this time. (As opposed to "Brooding batman who would likely kick a puppy because of how brooding and dark he is, because . . . they killed his parents!" Emo-Batman would hold a bleeding puppy to his chest, crying, while dark streaks of mascara ran down his face; not sure what Goth-Batman would do, possibly hail Satan and eat the puppy - I do not know enough about Gothness to know)

revealing plot of film, so, you know, don't read.
course the film was about emo-batman being emo about how his "darkness hiding in the shadows" actually lead to and created the villain, so much so that the villain was confused when Batman didn't realize he was the Riddler's partner in the crime wave (I couldn't have gotten those people without you, literally! You lead them to me, into the light)