- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,809
- SLU Posts
- 18459
www.dailykos.com
The hell it does. They're feeding email to a parody generator and interpreting some parody output as requests to respond.“Claude has a lot of freedom. It posts to the website autonomously, it posts to the discord autonomously, it checks its own email and writes its own responses. It chooses what questions it answers and what questions it doesn’t.”
I certainly find ChatGPT saves me a lot of time when I'm coding. It's way better at formulae and Google Apps Script in Google sheets than am I, and produces HTML-CSS-Javascript far faster than I ever could.That last pabel is so accurate.
It really feels like a lot of pwople are like "use the AI!" And everyone else is like, "ok, but for what?"
Its kind of "useful" as a time waster but completly unreliable for anything meaningful.
So here’s the big Firefox flaw demonstration that Anthropic gives us to work with. Right away it collapses. I mean like I can’t believe this went to print. The test (Section 3.3.3, pages 50-52) was not Firefox. That’s nice. Right off the bat. The Firefox test is not Firefox. It’s a SpiderMonkey JavaScript engine shell in a container, with “a testing harness mimicking a Firefox 147 content process, but without the browser’s process sandbox and other defense-in-depth mitigations.” (page 50)
The plot to the Mythos storyline gets even more involved.Anthropic's recently-announced AI bot Mythos, which press releases claimed was "so dangerous that it couldn't be released to the public" because it found like a gajillion devastating zero-day bugs in every single OS and system and piece of software ever written by humanity, turns out to be all hat and no cattle.
That was... something. I'm just not sure what. Maybe AI could have helped him draft a more coherent script.
I can neither confirm nor what to what wat wat wat wa wa wa WA.Don't tell me you never felt the need what to what? Wat wat wat wat wa wa wa wa wa wa! WA!
arstechnica.com
I love this because the fact it's in there implies that at some point in its development history you could ask this chatbot a question and it would just ignore you and start talking about raccoons instead, like a distracted toddler.The system prompt for OpenAI’s Codex CLI contains a perplexing and repeated warning for the most recent GPT model to “never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query.”
Where can I download this raccoon obsessed ChatGPT model?![]()
OpenAI Codex system prompt includes explicit directive to "never talk about goblins"
Directions also include system instructions to act like "you have a vivid inner life."arstechnica.com
I love this because the fact it's in there implies that at some point in its development history you could ask this chatbot a question and it would just ignore you and start talking about raccoons instead, like a distracted toddler.