- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 3,174
- Location
- Minnesnowta
- SL Rez
- 2007
- Joined SLU
- Dec 2010
That comment was clearly in reaction to the pushback that he/she is receiving here. The implication in the sentence is that those who disagree with them are neoliberals.<tangent \> OK I'm confused by the negative reaction to his neoliberal statement. Bush 43 had a hawkish cabinet packed with "Anarchy is fine, all they need are elections" neolibs running the Iraq war policy, so in my book neolibs are to liberal democracy what 19th century classical liberal economic theory is to Irish famine relief.
So yes, I can see neolibs starting World War 3, anyone seeing reality through a tightly constrained filter set based on flowcharts and decision trees and MacNamarish game theory full of predictable outcomes with huge reality gaps (Schlieffen plan, anyone? No? Well then how about domino theory?) has high odds of lighting the world on fire.
Or am I missing something?
Do you believe that anyone here is actually a neoliberal or was it more likely an attempt to portray as such?
















