Coronavirus Updates

Isabeau

Merdeuse
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
9,392
Location
Montréal
SL Rez
2007
I’ve also been wondering about why some are more affected than others. Obviously, the older and more vulnerable, but just in general. I recently read about the differences between people who are more susceptible to colds and flus, and those who seem to rarely get sick/show symptoms. I think I’ve had the flu once in my life (that affected me). The research is still relatively new, and may not apply to this type of virus, but I found it interesting. Maybe if we are able to pinpoint the reason, it could help in the future.
 

Sovereignty

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2020
Messages
754
SL Rez
2007
Oh, I think we all know. It will end with a lot of dead people. The only question is whether they die in a short time frame that is majorly disruptive or in a longer time frame that we can better manage as a society.

From what we're seeing now -- but don't clearly understand -- most people aren't that badly affected, but a smaller segment are knocked off their keister and if they're too old or health-compromised, they die. I'm curious as to whether there's some kind of biological/genetic difference between those two different outcomes. If there is an underlying component, then we're in for a Great Culling as the virus takes out the vulnerable people, over and over again as they age or contract other conditions. After a few decades, when we emerge from the other side, the human population that is left standing would be fine from that time on.
I am more optimistic. My optimism is that some therapeutic treatment will emerge. A number of drugs have shown promise in vitro, drugs that have already been proven to be safe enough like Remdesivir and Ivermectin. (Yes, people debate the safety of hydroxychloroquine even though a poorer tolerated version of it was used to treat Malaria for decades.)

Perhaps we will eventually find a solution through theoretical understanding and anecdotal evidence. Effective treatments have been discovered for diseases without randomized placebo-controlled trials in the past. Perhaps ... perhaps ... RCT's will be used mainly to convince sceptics and control allocation of resources more than for learning what is therapeutic and what is not.

What really gives me hope is that we have far greater theoretical understanding of COVID-19 in a short time than we've had for other diseases in the past. I am amazed at how much our knowledge of immunity has been advanced by study of diseases like AIDS (immense breakthroughs), SARS, MERS, Ebola, etc. Awareness of this knowledge within the general public has not kept up.
 

Bartholomew Gallacher

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
6,953
SL Rez
2002
Compare that with the baseball bullshit from 45..........
It would be sad if there would be no difference between being daddy's pampered son (Trump) and having earned PhD in theoretical physics (Merkel), would it? Merkel's PhD is not just for show, but she really had to work hard for it over years to achieve it.

While in contrast this is what Trump's teacher has the world to tell:
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
Reactions: eku zhong and Govi

Sid

Lord of the plywood cubes.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,055
Not a great teacher either, if he talks about (former) students in public.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Grandma Bates

danielravennest

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
3,708
SLU Posts
9073
THe second is a fast and effective test so we can identify people who are ill and target quarantine measures where we need them.
The US has only run about 5 tests for every positive result. That's not enough to trace the contacts of a positive case, and *their* contacts. To do that you need more like 20 tests per positive result.
 

Free

It's all in my head.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,830
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
Thing is, one, he's deceased, and two, it wasn't in public, but to someone he knew rather well [like a family friend or a son - I don't remember where I first heard this though, its been a while].
Maybe his psychiatrist blabbed.
 

Kara Spengler

Queer OccupyE9 Sluni-Goon, any/all pronouns
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,140
Location
SL: November RL: DC
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
December, 2008
SLU Posts
23289
Not a great teacher either, if he talks about (former) students in public.
Do teachers take an oath or something now? I would file it under politeness but was not aware education had the equivalent of hippa.
 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
24,119
SLU Posts
18459
No. The lockdowns are preventing hospitals from becoming overwhelmed. Look at Italy and imagine 10x the cases.
Certainly the overriding strategic goal in the UK is keep the rate of infection from overwhelming the NHS' ability to cope, which it seems we're achieving

 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
24,119
SLU Posts
18459

Ashiri

√(-1)
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
936
Location
RL: NZ
SL Rez
2007
SLU Posts
-1
Ok, time to rant.
The practice of abbreviating the virus name really bugs me.
End rant.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Aribeth Zelin

Soen Eber

Vatican mole
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
3,976
Ok, time to rant.
The practice of abbreviating the virus name really bugs me.
End rant.
In COVID-19, 'CO' stands for 'corona,' 'VI' for 'virus,' and 'D' for disease. Formerly, this disease was referred to as “2019 novel coronavirus” or “2019-nCoV”. There are many types of human coronaviruses including some that commonly cause mild upper-respiratory tract illnesses.
 

Aribeth Zelin

Faeryfox
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
4,140
SL Rez
2004
Joined SLU
03-11-2011
SLU Posts
9410
In COVID-19, 'CO' stands for 'corona,' 'VI' for 'virus,' and 'D' for disease. Formerly, this disease was referred to as “2019 novel coronavirus” or “2019-nCoV”. There are many types of human coronaviruses including some that commonly cause mild upper-respiratory tract illnesses.
Well, its more the 'Rona thing - for me, I prefer Covid-19 since there are other Corona viruses out there, and I can't help being a bit nitpicky....
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Ashiri

Ashiri

√(-1)
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
936
Location
RL: NZ
SL Rez
2007
SLU Posts
-1
Well, its more the 'Rona thing - for me, I prefer Covid-19 since there are other Corona viruses out there, and I can't help being a bit nitpicky....
Or even calling it corona by itself.
(Next time there's a report of a CME, will we get people claiming the sun is infecting us?)
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Aribeth Zelin

Kara Spengler

Queer OccupyE9 Sluni-Goon, any/all pronouns
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,140
Location
SL: November RL: DC
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
December, 2008
SLU Posts
23289
Certainly the overriding strategic goal in the UK is keep the rate of infection from overwhelming the NHS' ability to cope, which it seems we're achieving

Right, it is like removing the air from a balloon. You can let it slowly deflate or you can pop it. The same amount of air comes out either way but the latter is more disruptive.
 

Kara Spengler

Queer OccupyE9 Sluni-Goon, any/all pronouns
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,140
Location
SL: November RL: DC
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
December, 2008
SLU Posts
23289
Ok, time to rant.
The practice of abbreviating the virus name really bugs me.
End rant.
cv? Ducks.

What I am annoyed with is just calling it coronavirus ... which is a class of diseases. Or even novel before it as that just means new and will not make sense the next time there is one.
 
  • 1LOL
Reactions: Free

Free

It's all in my head.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,830
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
So, at most, he talked about his former student in private, and in what he believed was a conversation that would go no further, if in fact he said anything at all about Trump to his friend.
The issue is, does it sound like something he, or any former teacher of Trump's, would have said.
 

Fionalein

an old grumpy cat
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Messages
1,849
SL Rez
2017
No. The lockdowns are preventing hospitals from becoming overwhelmed. Look at Italy and imagine 10x the cases.
Here's the sad truth: the hospitals will be overwhelmed no matter what we do, but any step back to normal steals time we could invest in getting more infrastructure and reducing the number of people we have to sacrifice once the system collapses. If we start loosening the lockdowns now aleady we could as well never have started them...

So as said I still think the hard but short lockdowns were a publicity stunt before caving in to the industry lobby.
 

Innula Zenovka

Nasty Brit
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
24,119
SLU Posts
18459

The article mentions patients in hospital, so I don't know if it's connected, but yesterday I received a text from the local NHS practice where I'm registered telling me that they're participating in a trial, too, and inviting patients who have been showing symptoms of Covid-19 (dry cough, fever, fatigue) for less than a week to participate.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Interesting
Reactions: Govi and Sid