- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 24,019
- SLU Posts
- 18459
I suppose Andrew, mister Alpha, Tate thinks intelligence and wit are womanly traits.His response is quite something.
I’m not saying all climate deniers are pedophiles but it really makes you think.![]()
Andrew Tate put in 30-day pre-trial detention in Romania after arrest
Influencer, his brother and two others held on human trafficking, rape and organised crime chargeswww.theguardian.com
They're constantly being put upon, for their own reasons or refusal to accept change. To keep from internalizing their failures they punch down. Simple enough.I’m not saying all climate deniers are pedophiles but it really makes you think.
The oil giant Exxon privately “predicted global warming correctly and skilfully” only to then spend decades publicly rubbishing such science in order to protect its core business, new research has found.
A trove of internal documents and research papers has previously established that Exxon knew of the dangers of global heating from at least the 1970s, with other oil industry bodies knowing of the risk even earlier, from around the 1950s. They forcefully and successfully mobilized against the science to stymie any action to reduce fossil fuel use.
A new study, however, has made clear that Exxon’s scientists were uncannily accurate in their projections from the 1970s onwards, predicting an upward curve of global temperatures and carbon dioxide emissions that is close to matching what actually occurred as the world heated up at a pace not seen in millions of years.
Awww, I logged on here just to post that video but you beat me to it!
It seems like we're all watching the same vids! I've got that one queued up for watching later, and it's maybe the 5th or 6th I've watched that someone else had posted independently.
![]()
Their Arizona community was ideal. Then their neighbor cut off the water
Residents of Rio Verde Foothills had their water turned off by Scottsdale, which cites the mega-drought for the movewww.theguardian.com
They go on to state that Rio Verde Foothills never installed proper water infrastructure and has hauled water to the area in the past instead of spending money on a long term solution. The response continues a blistering litany of ways the people have been short sided and irresponsible and even ignoring many cheap alternatives because they refused to organize and pay taxes. These folks basically just started building and refused to regulate themselves. They have built in an extremely sensitive area that is driven by a regular fire cycle. I find it hard to feel much sympathy for these people when they have been acting irresponsibly for years and living off the infrastructure they have long refused to pay for.This is a case about the allocation of dwindling municipal water, and the demands
of Plaintiffs who want the benefits of organized government with none of the burdens.
Because Plaintiffs have sought an extraordinary remedy of a mandatory injunction against
the City, they bear a nearly insurmountable burden. A cursory review of the facts
demonstrates their inability to carry their burden
Yes, but I think the point is that, whatever the rights and wrongs of the individual case, the underlying problem is that, because of the climate crisis, the Colorado River basin is increasingly unable to support the region's demands for water.The Guardian article sounds relatively sympathetic to the people of Rio Verde Foothills with only one line about how the people there did nothing despite prior warnings:
![]()
Rio Verde Foothills getting creative after losing water source
Just days into the new year, residents in the Rio Verde Foothills community are getting creative with how they conserve and use water.www.abc15.com
The people of Rio Verde Foothills recently lost their court bid to stop this. The response from the city of Scottsdale can be found here:
The city straight up calls them irresponsible:
They go on to state that Rio Verde Foothills never installed proper water infrastructure and has hauled water to the area in the past instead of spending money on a long term solution. The response continues a blistering litany of ways the people have been short sided and irresponsible and even ignoring many cheap alternatives because they refused to organize and pay taxes. These folks basically just started building and refused to regulate themselves. They have built in an extremely sensitive area that is driven by a regular fire cycle. I find it hard to feel much sympathy for these people when they have been acting irresponsibly for years and living off the infrastructure they have long refused to pay for.
Doubtless their community's imprudence has greatly exacerbated the problem for the residents of Rio Verde Foothills in particular, but the underlying problem is that, because of the drought, there's a lot less water available than people planned for.Scottsdale’s decision to cut the water is a sign of what could await other communities in a region that, along with many, is getting drier and hotter in the climate crisis.
Twenty years ago, scientists overestimated the amount of water in the Colorado River, having measured based on an abnormally rainy season, said Sinjin Eberle, intermountain west communications director for American Rivers, a non-profit campaigning to protect and restore US waterways.
The river has 20% less water than it did in 2000, Eberle said. More than 40 million people in seven states served by the Colorado River basin – Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, California, New Mexico and Arizona – depend on the mighty but dwindling watercourse that flows through the Grand Canyon.