- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 24,160
- SLU Posts
- 18459
That would be the case if we had a strong executive presidency, as they do in places like the USA, France, Russia or Zimbabwe.It used to be the nightmare was if we had no Queen Tony Blair would have been President, but these days the even bigger nightmare is Boris Johnson as President.
If we had a primarily ceremonial president, though, as they do in Ireland, Germany or Italy, it wouldn't be such an issue.
Certainly I wouldn't have a problem with President David Attenborough or Usain Bolt or Amal Clooney or J K Rawlinson, but I'm far more concerned that the ceremonial Head of Government acts with the authority of Parliament to maintain the sovereignty of Parliament and the independence of the judiciary against an overreaching executive than am I about how that person chosen -- election or hereditary monarchy both work, so long as the elected president doesn't take that mean she or he has any sort of mandate that conflicts with that of Parliament.










