www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
www.bbc.co.uk
www.rawstory.com
Permanently hold up your pee helps too, costs no tax money and is very effectively.Pro-Trump candidate suggests taking 'all the boats out of the water' to lower sea levels
A Republican state legislative candidate in Virginia posed an interesting question on Twitter recently. "I'm curious, Do you think the sea level would lower, if we just took all the boats out of the water? Just a thought, not a statement," wrote Scott Pio, who is challenging Democratic Del...
www.theguardian.com
www.bbc.co.uk
www.theguardian.com
I'm somewhat skeptical about the "unlikely" tags sprinkled about, since the one consistent theme of climate science for the past 20 years has been "oh, this is happening faster than we anticipated". But taking this at face value, assuming their projections are spot on, anyone who lives beyond 2040 is in for a very rough ride.The climate disaster is here – this is what the future looks like
Earth is already becoming unlivable. Will governments act to stop this disaster from getting worse?
www.bbc.co.uk
Looks like I was born about the right time, then, since that's around my expected maximum lifespan, at most, so I probably won't live to see it.
www.theguardian.com
Same here. By 2040 I'd be 86 years old, and that's frankly an unlikely age for me to reach given my health "challenges." I'm okay with checking out sooner, given the generally blessed life I've lived up until now and the very stressful times that I would face in my dotage.
I'd be 93. I have every intention of lasting as long as possible - 'checking out sooner' may be acceptable to some, but I'm with Dylan Thomas Do not go gentle into that good night.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you misinterpreted my reference to "checking out" as a potential voluntary action on my part. As opposed to the fact that I have progressive heart disease and damaged lungs. My "intentions" to live as long as possible are irrelevant.
