Brian
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2018
- Messages
- 156
You were backing up Kara's jibe at the comment from ME about running for president:I was referring to going out and campaigning, not raising money. Which, I could have sworn I said 'campaigning, but if I didn't, that's what I meant.
And as for Bernie Sanders campaigning for Dems, yes, he's done that while promoting his own website for donations instead of the candidate's. But have you watched him on any news shows? The equal time they claim to give is to Republicans downing Democrats, and Bernie Sanders downing Republicans and Democrats. They have been doing this regularly, most of the time without Democrats.I like Warren in the Senate, but to see her on a national campaign for president now? I'm afraid she'll have her foot in her mouth almost daily. I could be wrong and she might surprise, but like all other possibilities, it's not my decision who runs and how they do it is on them. I personally like Sen. Harris and still think she might be needed in Senate even more. I have no more intention of giving Bernie Sanders the time of day. He's not even a Democrat and is quite comfortable attacking them as much as the right.
You can claim that Democrats are not as left as they were before the 70s but that's about it. There's nothing in most candidate platforms that look blatantly right wing to me unless they're Republican. The most right leaning Democratic Senator right now is probably Manchin. From W. Virginia. I don't like it but there's a good possibility that's the best we'll get from there any time soon. If Senate weren't so close, with party only deciding which side leads, I would be happy if he were primaried. And especially for the Senate, that's reason enough to vote specific party over any damn thing else.Both parties skew right, one far off into lala land. And instead of working on reaching out to the 40% that isn't in either, they ignore us, then blame us when we decide not to fall into line
Progressives have always had a voice in the party. This isn't suddenly false because of Bernie Sanders or anyone else.Sure, you know why? Because of the progressives, trying to regain a voice in the party.
This is not true.With no help from the main party [DNC, DCCC], running Republican levels of nasty ads against the more progressive candidates during the primaries.
You might find about 3 cases where DNC endorsed a candidate before primary was over (and I don't believe they should do that), and similar number where they encouraged someone to run where they did not see a candidate stepping up. Worst case there was they still endorsed one they encouraged to run after someone else also stepped up.
I will believe DNC ran nasty ads against candidates in primaries if you can show this citing sources.
To use words of others, this tired trope again? The bullshit label of 'corporate democrats' is nothing but an attempt to generally smear all without a reason to point to. Use candidate messaging, their platform, and their debating in Congress to know what their agenda is.The DNC and DCCC especially seem more worried about pleasing our corporate overlords, rather than worrying about what the average middle or working class person needs.
This has gone beyond old. It's fucking lazy.
Politics IS A PROBLEM. It always has been and worse now than ever in the US. Every single reason to vote solely for Democratic Party alone, for now and even a good number of year to come, has been spelled out pretty damn clear.Actually, it is. When people don't care what the politics are, but just vote based on 'I've always voted for this party', when people fight for their side, as if its an US vs Them, then that is a problem, and that you need someone to say this, means I probably should even be wasting my time typing this out, but it might help someone.
Who do you think you're helping by telling anyone to ignore party affiliation? I can find plenty it's hurting.
Tell that to Jeff Flake, who despite all his criticism of Trump to feel good in front of the public, still votes strictly along party lines.And considering that the GOP right now is voting to put rapists on the SCOTUS, and put the tax burden on those least able to take care of themselves, take away SS, medicare, and medicaid from those same people and those who've all paid into it, then by all means, I'd hope that someone has the heart to vote against all that. But not because of party lines, but because its the RIGHT THING TO DO.
Tell that to voters in Maine who elected Susan Collins because her 'middle of the road' Republicanism sounds good when she's running, but still votes along party lines most of the time, including putting rapists and outright wingnuts on SC.
For the most part, the political party is a group dedicated to the same goals.
It's time to be brave enough to pick a side when it's needed despite how popular it is to be criticized for it.








