Noodles
The sequel will probably be better.
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 5,995
- Location
- Illinois
- SL Rez
- 2006
- Joined SLU
- 04-28-2010
- SLU Posts
- 6947
Meanwhile, Target is now on Life Support for bending to Fascism.
Speaking at an event at the start of San Francisco’s Climate Week, Gore said the Trump administration was “trying to create their own preferred version of reality” to achieve their sweeping objectives similar to Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party in the 1930s and ‘40s.
aka Godwin's LawThe problem is that people have been comparing anything and everything they don't like to Hitler for so long that doing so no longer has any impact.
I plan to read this, and it seems well put for sure.Here's a piece of American toy manufacturer Molson Hart about the problems you're facing when trying to bring manufacturing back to America. He's giving 14 (!) reasons why bringing back manufacturing to America will fail, so quite a long read.
Whoa. That was quite a stark read. Really puts a face to what this country is going through.
Oh, it has an impact.... Which is that they're now taking pride in the comparison and standing united behind it with a defiant "so what, you can't stop us!" attitude.The problem is that people have been comparing anything and everything they don't like to Hitler for so long that doing so no longer has any impact.
The house that I'm living in was built in the 1890s, in a neighborhood called Boomtown. It was -- and still is -- a working-class neighborhood that sprang up almost overnight to house the workers for various manufacturing industries, from textile mills to brickworks. All gone, of course. Now this area is overwhelmingly elderly couples who have owned homes here their whole lives and younger families who rent from the slumlords who bought up all the property from the even older people who have died. Drugs are rampant, as is poverty. Most of those renters are paying with vouchers from social assistance services.We need to make Americans healthy again. Many people are too obese to work. Crime and drugs. It needs to stop.
I think we need to stop pretending that we can revitalize every remote rural area. Many people would be much better off moving to bigger cities with more opportunity and more infrastructure. I also fully realize that my statement is much easier said than done. Relocating people still takes a lot of time and money, but I think anything is better than just waiting around for some magical policy to turn around small rural areas who's reason for existing has vanished (like whatever factory or mine caused the town to be built). I do feel bad for a lot of the rural people who really thought Trump would somehow revitalize their towns though.The house that I'm living in was built in the 1890s, in a neighborhood called Boomtown. It was -- and still is -- a working-class neighborhood that sprang up almost overnight to house the workers for various manufacturing industries, from textile mills to brickworks. All gone, of course. Now this area is overwhelmingly elderly couples who have owned homes here their whole lives and younger families who rent from the slumlords who bought up all the property from the even older people who have died. Drugs are rampant, as is poverty. Most of those renters are paying with vouchers from social assistance services.
We're a large town (just on the verge of enough population to qualify as a city) in a state that is largely rural and very poor. Even though we're within a (long) commute distance from a major metro area, it's difficult to entice businesses to locate here for many of the reasons the OP listed. About ten years ago a new distribution center opened up on the outskirts of town, but hiring enough workers was challenging. Too many people failed the mandatory drug tests. The roads are poorly maintained, electrical brownouts are not uncommon, there's limited funds for winter snow removal.
Our local schools are better than in other parts of the state, but they're still not good, so it's hard to persuade families to move here. The best and brightest workers can make more money in any of the states surrounding us, so they move out or commute to those jobs. I'm a case in point: I bought my house here because the prices were lower (we're childless so the school quality was irrelevant), but I worked in another state until I retired.
We're like a microcosm of what is wrong with the entire country.
They could always try turning their small towns into tourist traps.I think we need to stop pretending that we can revitalize every remote rural area. Many people would be much better off moving to bigger cities with more opportunity and more infrastructure. I also fully realize that my statement is much easier said than done. Relocating people still takes a lot of time and money, but I think anything is better than just waiting around for some magical policy to turn around small rural areas who's reason for existing has vanished (like whatever factory or mine caused the town to be built). I do feel bad for a lot of the rural people who really thought Trump would somehow revitalize their towns though.
It seems to me like there is a game going on in American politics where politicians pretend they can turn around rural America and rural Americans kind of know it's bullshit but nobody wants to just face the fact that the factories and mills etc are not coming back.
We've long had that problem here in the UK. The fact of the matter is that towns and cities, like any other form of human organisation, change over time, and there are plenty of examples of places that grew and became prosperous because of the demands of particular local industries and, when those industries have declined or ceased to exist (e.g. coal mining in the UK, or many fishing ports) have suffered huge declines because, if you're not employed by those industries, or for a business that supplies those industries, there's not much point in living or doing business there.I think we need to stop pretending that we can revitalize every remote rural area. Many people would be much better off moving to bigger cities with more opportunity and more infrastructure. I also fully realize that my statement is much easier said than done. Relocating people still takes a lot of time and money, but I think anything is better than just waiting around for some magical policy to turn around small rural areas who's reason for existing has vanished (like whatever factory or mine caused the town to be built). I do feel bad for a lot of the rural people who really thought Trump would somehow revitalize their towns though.
It seems to me like there is a game going on in American politics where politicians pretend they can turn around rural America and rural Americans kind of know it's bullshit but nobody wants to just face the fact that the factories and mills etc are not coming back.
there is a long, sad, pathetic history of republicans opposing disaster relief except for their own states. ...this lack of self awareness needs to be studied.GOP Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Arkansas Republican lawmakers urge Trump to reconsider denial of disaster relief - ABC News
I knew this would happen. Getting what she voted for. Karma is a bitch and so is Huckabee
Work from home really could be the real solution here, not in every case, and to some extent it would require some to accept a but more "effort" for some activities. But it spreads the need for housing out a lot, which helps with the stupid housing cost problem that cities have.For a brief time it looked like Work from Home policies were going to help some of those communities. As long as they have the internet infrastructure, people could take advantage of cheap real estate and preferences for living in small communities.
I know of a number of communities in Arkansas that functioned as nurseries and retirement homes, with the bulk of the working age population relocating to cities and then coming to retire near family.