I think it's good that the artist is reportedly on board with the dismantling plan, although of course we don't know how much of that is voluntary vs. not really.
Obviously it wasn't the artist's intention to glorify the mass-hanging of the Dakota; it was an anti-capital punishment piece. But there's an important lesson to be learned about sensitivity toward victims of atrocities when depicting them in art, even if the message of the art is supposed to be "this wasn't right".
Well, yes. Quite. However, I dug a bit deeper into the story and found this.
In his own statement, the artist explained that he created the piece "as a learning space for people like me, white people who have not suffered the effects of a white supremacist society and who may not consciously know that it exists."
If "Scaffold" is removed, the learning space may offer some lessons different from those Durant intended.
In 1862 in Mankato, authorities hanged 38 Dakota men for their roles in the brief U.S.-Dakota war that had occurred in southwestern Minnesota that August and September. The pain of the war's aftermath lingers today.
www.mprnews.org
That's all very admirable of him, I'm sure, but why on earth did neither the artist nor the officials of the Walker Art Centre not think to consult the Dakota people about their views on the project, which must have been discussed in several meetings and committees, whether public or private?
We are told,
A similar work apparently caused no such uproar in Europe.
It can't have been that similar then, can it? What's objectionable about the piece is no one thought to ask the Dakota about it first, and how they thought the hanging should be commemorated, and by whom.
They shouldn't just erect an enormous piece of public sculpture like that without consulting those who are still injured by the event it commemorates. Doesn't matter what the artist's or the Centre's motives were -- they simply thoughtlessly added to the hurt they thought they were condemning, and made matters worse.
I'm very glad they've been able to resolve it.
It's not difficult -- other countries, and especially the UK, have horrible things in our histories too, but we're slowly learning how to acknowledge them without simply giving unnecessary offence to the victims' descendents.
I mean, a massive public sculpture commemorating mass genocidal hangings? It's not difficult to realise a bit of sensitivity was called for here, for God's sake.