Nobody Cares about Your Health

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565

 

CronoCloud Creeggan

Eliza, because Free says so.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
2,044
Location
Central Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
07-25-2012
SLU Posts
278

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
They likely won't admit to it, but I smell AI is involved here. And it smells real bad.

Certain studies within the Trump administration's "Make America Healthy Again" report do not exist as cited, ABC News has confirmed.

Dr. Katherine Keyes, a researcher cited in the report as a first author of a paper on rates of depression and anxiety among teens during the pandemic, confirmed to ABC News that she did not write a paper cited in the report that the White House's Make America Healthy Again Commission headed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unveiled last week.

"I was surprised to see what seems to be an error in the citation of my work in the report, and it does make me concerned given that citation practices are an important part of conducting and reporting rigorous science," Keyes wrote to ABC News in an email.
 
  • 1* Popcorn *
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Govi and Ryanna Enfield

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, a vaccine sceptic, has removed all 17 members of a committee that issues official government recommendations on immunisations.

Announcing the move in an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Kennedy said that conflicts of interest on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (Acip) were responsible for undermining trust in vaccinations.

Kennedy said he wanted to "ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible."
Sure you do.
 

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
‘Extremely disturbing and unethical’: new rules allow VA doctors to refuse to treat Democrats, unmarried veterans
Doctors at Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals nationwide could refuse to treat unmarried veterans and Democrats under new hospital guidelines imposed following an executive order by Donald Trump.

The new rules, obtained by the Guardian, also apply to psychologists, dentists and a host of other occupations. They have already gone into effect in at least some VA medical centers.

Medical staff are still required to treat veterans regardless of race, color, religion and sex, and all veterans remain entitled to treatment. But individual workers are now free to decline to care for patients based on personal characteristics not explicitly prohibited by federal law.
The administration is claiming this is not true.


I suspect we'll get trumped either way.
 

Casey Pelous

Senior Discount
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
2,361
Location
USA, upper left corner
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
February, 2011
SLU Posts
10461
The administration is claiming this is not true.
"This is a damnable lie. The order applies to ALL health care workers, not just the VA. Thank you for the chance to clear this up."
 

GoblinCampFollower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,293
SL Rez
2007
‘Extremely disturbing and unethical’: new rules allow VA doctors to refuse to treat Democrats, unmarried veterans


The administration is claiming this is not true.


I suspect we'll get trumped either way.
It sounds like they meant to just target transgender people but due to their general incompetence hit other groups with the lazy legal language.
 

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
This looks interesting.

Amanda Smith celebrates the day, August 1, nearly two years ago, when she stopped taking insulin to manage her type one diabetes, just a few months after getting a dose of experimental stem cells as part of a study.

“I remember, like, being scared and excited, and it’s history now,” she said.

The 36-year-old nurse and mother is part of a small, but what some call “milestone study,” of patients with Type 1 Diabetes using manufactured stem cells, designed to grow in the liver and become the full array of pancreatic islet cells that naturally control blood sugar levels.
In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers report that of the 12 patients who received a single dose of the stem cells, it eliminated the need for insulin in 10 for at least a year and stopped episodes of low blood sugar, or hypoglycemia, which can lead to dangerous complications, even death. For Amanda, the treatment has been a blessing.
 

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
I'm not bothered by the initiative, but rather who is leading it. Also, I'm sure the poor will be left of of this great MAHA plan.

The road to “make America healthy again” will apparently be paved with Apple Watches. Health and Human Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has just unveiled a campaign that will try to encourage the widespread use of wearables.

RFK Jr. announced the initiative Tuesday afternoon during a House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee meeting to discuss the HHS’ budget request for the upcoming fiscal year. In response to a question from Senator Troy Balderson (R-Ohio) about wearables, Kennedy revealed that HHS will soon conduct one of the agency’s largest ever advertising campaigns to promote their use. He added that in his ideal future, every American will be donning a wearable within the next four years.
 

Casey Pelous

Senior Discount
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
2,361
Location
USA, upper left corner
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
February, 2011
SLU Posts
10461
I'm not bothered by the initiative, but rather who is leading it. Also, I'm sure the poor will be left of of this great MAHA plan.

Meh. As of now, there's very, very little evidence that wearables make any measurable difference in outcomes.

 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Govi

Lexxi

meow
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
1,235
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
12-14-2007
SLU Posts
6381
I'm not bothered by the initiative, but rather who is leading it. Also, I'm sure the poor will be left of of this great MAHA plan.

I'm willing to be proved wrong and admit when I'm wrong. I reacted with the idea that wrist watch usage is not exactly as common, today, as it was like, say, in 1950. And the initial things I saw did suggest that idea. So, my initial reaction was something along the lines of "RFK jr's big health improvement idea is to get people to wear wrist watches that have health monitor technology in them when wearing watches has been on a downward slop for decades now?" Apparently I'm wrong.

The adoption of wrist-worn wearable devices in the United States has shown a consistent upward trajectory over the past decade. A Nielsen survey from 2014 reported that 15% of consumers were already using wearable technology. 1 By 2019, a Pew Research Center survey indicated that 21% of U.S. adults regularly wore a smartwatch or wearable fitness tracker. 2 Other data from 2019 showed smartwatch adoption among US adults at 18%, increasing to 23% by 2021. 3

Tech-Styles: Are Consumers Really Interested in Wearing Tech on their Sleeves? - Nielsen

nielsen.com/insights/2014/tech-styles-are-consumers-really-interested-in-wearing-tech-on-their-sleeves

About one-in-five Americans use a smart watch or fitness tracker - Pew Research Center

pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/01/09/about-one-in-five-americans-use-a-smart-watch-or-fitness-tracker

Smartwatch Statistics 2025 By Wearables, Technology, Devices - Market.us Scoop

scoop.market.us/smartwatch-statistics

United States Traditional and Smart Watch Market Size, Share

inkwoodresearch.com/reports/united-states-traditional-and-smart-watch-market


The expansion continued into the early 2020s, with wearable device adoption reaching 36.36% in 2022, a notable increase from 28-30% in 2019. By April 2022, a survey found that 45% of Americans regularly wore smartwatches or fitness trackers. More recently, as of March 2024, 41% of respondents in the United States and Canada reported owning wearable devices, with 32% actively using them. This distinction between ownership and active usage is important, as it suggests a segment of owners who may not regularly utilize their devices.

The varying percentages across different sources (e.g., 21% in 2019 from Pew, 36.36% in 2022 from JMIR, 45% in 2022 from ValuePenguin, and 41% ownership/32% usage in March 2024 from Market.us Scoop) can be attributed to differences in survey methodology, sample populations (e.g., "adults," "internet users," "broadband households"), and the precise definition of "wearable device" or "regularly wear" at the time of each survey. Despite these variations, the consistent increase in reported figures from 2019 to 2024 underscores a strong upward trend in the adoption of wrist-worn smart devices. This rapid increase highlights the mainstream acceptance of smart, wrist-worn technology, indicating its movement beyond early adopters to a significant portion of the general population. This also suggests that the market for these devices is dynamic and still expanding, although some analyses suggest it might be approaching maturity in major markets like the US.
Basically, smartwatch ownership (as opposed to usage) has gone from 14% in 2014 to 41% in 2024.

Despite the significant rise of smartwatches, traditional watches continue to maintain a substantial presence in the United States market. The US remains one of the largest global markets for personal luxury goods and high-end watches. In 2017, high-end watches alone represented 77% of total watch sales, indicating a strong preference for classic timepieces among a significant consumer segment.

The combined US market for traditional and smartwatches was valued at $20.67 billion in 2023, with projections to reach $34.25 billion by 2032. In terms of volume, 74.13 million units were sold in 2023, expected to grow to 125.17 million units by 2032. More broadly, the US watch market (encompassing both traditional and smart) was valued at $22.77 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $34.34 billion by 2033. Luxury watches, driven by collectors and high-net-worth individuals, account for a significant share of this market. The analog segment, specifically, dominated the US luxury watch market in 2024, valued for its timeless appeal, craftsmanship, and prestige.
Despite the widespread adoption of both smart and traditional wristwatches, several factors contribute to individuals choosing not to wear them. The most prominent reason for the decline in traditional wristwatch wearing is the ubiquity of cell phones. With 91% of Americans constantly connected to their mobile devices, a wristwatch can be perceived as redundant for time-telling. Phones are accurate, and since individuals already carry them, there is a perception of "why carry more?".

For smartwatches, specific concerns act as barriers to broader adoption. Privacy and security concerns regarding the collection and transmission of personal data are significant drawbacks. Wearable devices continuously collect sensitive information such as biometric data, activity logs, and location tracking, raising valid consumer anxieties. The potential for distraction and over-reliance on technology is another concern, as wearers may become overly focused on their devices rather than their surroundings.
I don't carry or wear a watch, traditional or 'smart', because of that 'why carry more', I'm already carrying a phone (actually two phones, one for work, one personal). That 'privacy and security concerns' part also plays something in why I do not want RFK jr's Apple watch.
 

Noodles

The sequel will probably be better.
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
5,015
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
I'm not bothered by the initiative, but rather who is leading it. Also, I'm sure the poor will be left of of this great MAHA plan.

I have serious doubts about what is motivating this given these assholes want to surveilence state everyone to the extreme.

And they can be motivating, but I stopped wearing my Fitbit, after like a decade of daily use, because I just, stopped seeing the real value to it. I never did anything with the data. It also felt a bit inaccurate. Plus I don't like that Google bought Fitbit.
 

GoblinCampFollower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,293
SL Rez
2007
I have serious doubts about what is motivating this given these assholes want to surveilence state everyone to the extreme.

And they can be motivating, but I stopped wearing my Fitbit, after like a decade of daily use, because I just, stopped seeing the real value to it. I never did anything with the data. It also felt a bit inaccurate. Plus I don't like that Google bought Fitbit.
Yeah... such a program would be VERY expensive to implement and this is from people who act like free healthcare is insane socialism. I would be shocked if such an effort got funding at all, and if so, I'd question their motives a lot.
 

Casey Pelous

Senior Discount
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
2,361
Location
USA, upper left corner
SL Rez
2007
Joined SLU
February, 2011
SLU Posts
10461
Yeah... such a program would be VERY expensive to implement and this is from people who act like free healthcare is insane socialism. I would be shocked if such an effort got funding at all, and if so, I'd question their motives a lot.
Once you can present them to get through the Loyalty Checkpoints (the approved watches will constantly monitor for Unamerican Speech or Acts) they should catch on quickly.

"Your papers, please? Oh, I see you have a Trumpwatch(TM). One moment while I download the data..."
 

CronoCloud Creeggan

Eliza, because Free says so.
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
2,044
Location
Central Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
07-25-2012
SLU Posts
278
Once you can present them to get through the Loyalty Checkpoints (the approved watches will constantly monitor for Unamerican Speech or Acts) they should catch on quickly.

"Your papers, please? Oh, I see you have a Trumpwatch(TM). One moment while I download the data..."
Or they might go more traditional in the Amerikareich: "Papieren bitte. Alles Ordnung."
 

Free

TO WHAR!
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
37,832
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
Nowhere has that tension been more clear than in the newly-minted Health and Human Services secretary's war on synthetic food dyes, which is his first battle in what he's framing as a war to reconstitute the United States' ultraprocessed food system.

As the New York Times reports, RFK is already encountering roadblocks from Mars, the manufacturer of popular snacks including M&Ms and Skittles, to his proposed dye ban. Several other major food companies, including Nestle and Kraft Heinz, quickly jumped on board — but Mars is signaling that it won't remove the dyes without regulatory action.

And to get that, RFK will need the political clout of figures going right to the top of the administration. And on that front, unfortunately, he could be stymied by a simple reality: Trump is, on a personal level, very fond of colorful candy.
Earlier this year, Rolling Stone reported that Trump has been so obsessed with candy during both his presidential terms that he has demanded aides keep bowls and baskets filled not just with colorful M&Ms, but also Life Savers and Starburst, among other sugary morsels.
Maybe RFK Jr can convince Trump to start eating healthy snacks. :hellokitty: