So... I watched "Rebel Moon part 2: the scar giver" or whatever. (What scar? Was that covered in the first part? If so it wasn't that memorable.)
I didn't hate it. But I went in with expectations so very low, surpassing them only really required being interesting enough that I didn't fall asleep while watching. (His dc movies failed that test... And I saw them in a theater).
The first time I watch something I like to "immerse" and just lose myself in watching uncritically. It succeeded at pulling me in a few times, but rarely for long. There are so many problems that it kept knocking me back into my head with questions or criticisms.
I have a theory... The moon where the story takes place is orbiting a massive ringed gas giant... The gravitational forces must be so extreme that it causes frequent "time dilation storms", thus all the ridiculously excessive use of slow motion. Reaping wheat... Walking,... Panning around a stationary robot, "slow" blasters. Without all the slow-mo, part 1 and 2 could probably fit together into a normal length movie.
Or, Maybe Snyder thought the saying was "*slow*, don't tell".
On the positive side... The visuals are nice, and more time focused on them meant less talking, which rarely rose aboveb the level of "pure cringe". I guess Snyder's workaround to the writer's strike was to go without one. I kind of wish I watched it dubbed into French (which I'm not fluent in), and just relied on context.