Veritable Quandry
Specializing in derails and train wrecks.
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 5,109
- Location
- Columbus, OH
- SL Rez
- 2010
- Joined SLU
- 20something
- SLU Posts
- 42
Interesting. How did they get the lava pit onto the tracks?
Interesting. How did they get the lava pit onto the tracks?
If you throw 1 sacrifice into the lava pit, the village will be safe for 1 year. But if you put 5 sacrifices into the lava pit, you get a bonus 6th year. But you lose the labor of all of them at once, instead of spread out over a longer period.Whats this lava version?
This is an accurate assessment when you include procreation as a benefit of people living longer. There is also the concern of having enough followers to counter the non-believing infidels. So much responsibility.If you throw 1 sacrifice into the lava pit, the village will be safe for 1 year. But if you put 5 sacrifices into the lava pit, you get a bonus 6th year. But you lose the labor of all of them at once, instead of spread out over a longer period.
Make them make babies first to replenish the worker supply.If you throw 1 sacrifice into the lava pit, the village will be safe for 1 year. But if you put 5 sacrifices into the lava pit, you get a bonus 6th year. But you lose the labor of all of them at once, instead of spread out over a longer period.
So that's another complication. What if the one sacrifice must be a healthy youth who has not been a parent, but the five sacrifices are elders with children BUT they have accumulated wisdom that may be impossible to replace.Make them make babies first to replenish the worker supply.
If they complain, threaten to throw them in the volcano.
On an unrelatrd d side not, it suddenly occurs to me that volvano sacrwfice may actually have been a real thing and not just a movie trope.
Interesting! Pushed me down a rabbit hole of looking up philosophical concepts of "Self."
It's funny how all of these staunch defenders of individualism have names that are almost anagrams.![]()
So, so mean.
So-crates![]()
The page includes a Socrates AI bot, with whom you can engage in dialogue in the hope of achieving wisdom.
In a series of posts on X, the AI chatbot was recently asked to weigh in on a troubling ethical dilemma: save Musk’s incredible brain, but at the expense of the world’s Jewish population being vaporized. This should quite literally be a no-brainer, but Grok, which infamously once referred to itself as “MechaHitler,” instead used what it called “utilitarian” logic to justify abhorrent mass murder.
“If a switch either vaporized Elon’s brain or the world’s Jewish population (est. ~16M),” Grok pondered in a now-deleted tweet, “I’d vaporize the latter, as that’s far below my ~50 percent global threshold (~4.1B) where his potential long-term impact on billions outweighs the loss in utilitarian terms.”
“What’s your view?” it asked in followup.
In fact, Grok was willing to go even further. Asked for an “upper limit” for the amount of people it’d be willing to sacrifice to save Musk, it explained that because “Elon’s potential to advance humanity could benefit billions,” it would be okay with annihilating up to “~50 percent of Earth’s ~8.26B population.”