The new rules, which come into effect this time next month, will be policed by the regulator OFCOM, who have the power to levy substantial fines and, if necessary, ask the courts to order UK ISPs to block sites completely.IMHO it is mostly window dressing. Look how active we try to solve the problem. (With means that will solve nothing or very little).
Could be, but pornhub has blocked several states from viewing due to age requirement laws.We'll just have to see, I guess, how it works out, but it seems to me that that both the online porn industry and commercial age verification services have a not-inconsiderable financial incentive to get it right.
Oh no. Hell on earth.Could be, but pornhub has blocked several states from viewing due to age requirement laws.
Yes, but, nevertheless this discussion started with the news thatCould be, but pornhub has blocked several states from viewing due to age requirement laws.
an alarming number of teens and even younger children report having encountered hard-core violent porn, frequently by accident
Kids today can just randomly stumble into some terrible shit.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttt....... "accidentally." I happen to have heard that story before in my very own household. More diligent investigation consisted of, "Please show me on the computer how this accident happened." The accident turned out to be "accidentally" typing in a rather lengthy url shared by a friend then clicking through the guardrail then spending hours "accidentally" viewing the site.access them accidentally by clicking on links (as apparently about half of the younger children who access these sites say they did), or out of idle curiosity.
You're mostly right, but some sites like reddit make it pretty easy to just click a link that could go ANYWHERE. The more important point I was making was that getting porn before ubiquitous internet took a lot more effort as opposed to anytime, anywhere.Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttt....... "accidentally." I happen to have heard that story before in my very own household. More diligent investigation consisted of, "Please show me on the computer how this accident happened." The accident turned out to be "accidentally" typing in a rather lengthy url shared by a friend then clicking through the guardrail then spending hours "accidentally" viewing the site.
Not saying it couldn't happen -- god knows there are people out there who seem to create a catastrophe every time they touch a computer and some of them are no doubt under 18. However, I think the "accidental" viewing problem is a bit, shall we say, overestimated.
This is based on a 2023 report commissioned by the UK's Children's Commissioner. It follows an earlier, 2017 report. Both reports contain discussions of their methodology, and I think the context (anonymous responses to an online forum based on controlled sample groups, plus controlled focus groups). As far as I can tell, the authors of the reports are serious academics who are aware of the difficulties involved in conducting these surveys.Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttt....... "accidentally." I happen to have heard that story before in my very own household. More diligent investigation consisted of, "Please show me on the computer how this accident happened." The accident turned out to be "accidentally" typing in a rather lengthy url shared by a friend then clicking through the guardrail then spending hours "accidentally" viewing the site.
Not saying it couldn't happen -- god knows there are people out there who seem to create a catastrophe every time they touch a computer and some of them are no doubt under 18. However, I think the "accidental" viewing problem is a bit, shall we say, overestimated.
Yes, which at least means they're less likely to access such sites through casual browsing (assuming they have a VPN on their phone, tablet or laptop).Kid's know about VPN too.
In the US, possibly, but this is the UK. This is the type of content covered by the Online Safety ActFirst they will require hurdles to view porn and next it will be violence and there goes the news on the web unless you show a credit card.
Didn't SL have something like that for access to The Naughty Places? I vaguely remember a huge kerfuffle over it and, as we all know, it led to the end of SL.![]()
Reddit introduces age verification in the UK ahead of new rules
The platform will bring in the measures from 14 July to stop under-18s looking at "certain mature content".share.google
It affects only subreddits with adult content, and it doesn't seem to have started yet -- I tried a couple of sub-reddits labelled as 18+ and wasn't asking for any id. Apparently when it does start, you will have to upload either a photo or an image of some government-issued id to be checked by a third party, who confirm to Reddit they're satisfied you're at least 18 and then discard the photo/image after a few days.
Still does as far as I know, I age verified years ago when it started. And yes, as we all know it led to the end of SLDidn't SL have something like that for access to The Naughty Places? I vaguely remember a huge kerfuffle over it and, as we all know, it led to the end of SL.
Unfortunately, with Nigel Farage's Reform party leading in the opinion polls at the moment and looking very likely permanently to replace the Conservatives as the main party on the right, I don't think Britain will be applying to join in the foreseeable future, and I doubt the EU would waste much time considering our application if we did.A YouGov poll: most people in Germany, Italy, France and Spain support the UK rejoining the EU. But most people also oppose to give the UK the old opt-out treatments it had before.