LoveWorld News broadcast ‘potentially harmful statements’ about the virus
www.theguardian.com
Yet another example of why I'm so glad I live in a country where freedom of speech is a qualified, rather than an absolute, right -- the government can't regulate TV, but the independent regulator, OFCOM, can, within the framework of the Human Rights Act and the ECHR.
I started thinking about the traditional "marketplace of ideas" response to this that I often see repeated by US legal commentators like Ken White at Popehat, for whom I have a very high regard indeed -- don't censor nonsense, but debunk it instead -- but I think that analogy breaks down, in that marketplaces need to be regulated too, to prevent people selling fake or hazardous goods.
We don't, after all, allow people to sell cars with faulty brakes, or food with particular carcinogenic additives, or highly flammable furniture, and allow the market to sort out which are safe to use and which aren't, so why should the marketplace of ideas not be in some way subject to various standards?