WolfEyes
Well known member no one knows
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 4,502
- SL Rez
- 2004
- Joined SLU
- 2009
Not all of their enemies are on the outside.All joking aside, Facebook has a lot of enemies... that's why I was quick to assume someone would attack them.
Right. My stuff isn't internet based, but when I push a change to production, it goes through approvals and testing. Obviously, not every minor bug is caught in testing, but we'd know if it just flat crashes...Yeah, that's what I don't get. Facebook should be better than this. I have to go throgh a rediculous multilevel approval process with a detailed MOP and blackout procedure to do the most mundane and nothing level tasks. If it's anything major you get calls going with important parties and you do it from 2AM-5AM.
Granted Facebook is more global, so they don't really have an overnight time. But seriously, how did someone or some comitee fuck up so bad.
(Granted my company probably runs like half the "tubes" of the internet or more so a fuck up could be worse than just FB, but FB is still pretty huge.)
The more cynical view on Twitter is that they shut down to purge incriminating documents after the whistleblower interview. I'm not sure how this would involve the whole service going down, especially when it means the employees couldn't get into the building.Yeah, that's what I don't get. Facebook should be better than this. I have to go throgh a rediculous multilevel approval process with a detailed MOP and blackout procedure to do the most mundane and nothing level tasks. If it's anything major you get calls going with important parties and you do it from 2AM-5AM.
Granted Facebook is more global, so they don't really have an overnight time. But seriously, how did someone or some comitee fuck up so bad.
(Granted my company probably runs like half the "tubes" of the internet or more so a fuck up could be worse than just FB, but FB is still pretty huge.)
cough, VVO, coughFacebook’s Apps Went Down. The World Saw How Much It Runs on Them. (msn.com)
Or why I don't use any social medias.
I figured you'd say that. VVO is not FB, Instragram, What'sApp, MySpace or any of those. It's a forum. I don't have any RL friends or family here. Granted VVO has some of the aspects of social media but SLU did not. Generally a forum is categorized by topics, people follow the topics that they are interested in and create threads of discussions. In a forum there was no concept of followers and followings prior to programmers succumbing to whatever idiots thought it would be a good idea to add social media features to forums.cough, VVO, cough
So reddit or youtube are not social media by your definition? You pick the discussion channels you like or you can like a creator but there are no friends lists or any way for someone to follow me as a non creator.Social media has the concept of followers and followings and friends, this is the foundation of it. Discussion is the foundation of a forum.
I think message boards qualify as social media but absolutely see your point. They are different... A lot of the psychological problems people have with social media are because of how they make some people compare themselves to others and anonymous message boards aren't quite like that. Forums can still be quite toxic in their own ways, but it's an apples to oranges comparison. ...both fruit, but different fruit.I figured you'd say that. VVO is not FB, Instragram, What'sApp, MySpace or any of those. It's a forum. I don't have any RL friends or family here. Granted VVO has some of the aspects of social media but SLU did not. Generally a forum is categorized by topics, people follow the topics that they are interested in and create threads of discussions. In a forum there was no concept of followers and followings prior to programmers succumbing to whatever idiots thought it would be a good idea to add social media features to forums.
Social media has the concept of followers and followings and friends, this is the foundation of it. Discussion is the foundation of a forum.
I wouldn't call YouTube social media, no. It focuses on videos, not discussions. Reddit isn't centralized like a forum is. There are people who follow others and they don't have channels or whatever they call them. You don't have to create one to have followers or chat or post. Reddit is not a forum.So reddit or youtube are not social media by your definition? You pick the discussion channels you like or you can like a creator but there are no friends lists or any way for someone to follow me as a non creator.
It's the first result (making it the last result on the second page).On an unrelated note, doing a search on VVO for Facebook and checking Search Titles Only does not come up with this thread which must be some sort of bug.
I stand corrected. Ugh, it should put results in order of last post, not thread created date imo, but yes it's there.It's the first result (making it the last result on the second page).
Facebook knew its recommendation algorithm was a problem, so it set up a study to test out just how bad the problem was.
In the study, entitled “Carol’s Journey to QAnon—A Test User Study of Misinfo & Polarization Risks Encountered through Recommendation Systems,” Facebook set up some brand-new accounts.
Each of these accounts followed a small number of high-quality or verified conservative-interest pages, such as Fox News, former President Donald Trump, and former first lady Melania Trump. The study found that “within just one day, Page recommendations had already devolved toward polarizing content.”
Within two days, recommendations began to include conspiracy content. “It took less than 1 week to get a QAnon recommendation,” the report found.
For years, Facebook ignored the warnings of extremism researchers who flagged the potential threat posed by the rise of QAnon on mainstream platforms like Facebook and Instagram.
This escalated in 2020, as the pandemic saw a rapid uptick in the number of people being radicalized into QAnon conspiracies through Facebook. Yet Facebook only acted when it was too late, and in some cases it even reversed decisions that had helped limit the spread of QAnon.
According to Haugen’s complaint, Facebook knew its ability to connect people in huge numbers via its Groups was facilitating the rise of QAnon.
“The QAnon community relied on minimally connected bulk group invites. One member sent over 377,000 group invites in less than 5 months,” according to an internal Facebook report entitled “Harmful Non-Violating Narratives.”
The report’s author noted that Facebook’s own engineers had found ways to slow this growth. One way was by limiting the number of invites a user could send out in a single day to 100, a measure introduced ahead of the U.S. election in October 2020.
“[However] we have rolled back the pre-election rate limit of 100 Group invites/day due to it having significant regression on Group growth,” the report stated.