Being a little less optimistic maybe at this point, but I gotta say how I feel about this sort of thing in general:
The original lunar module that landed on the Moon could only hold two people, a very small amount of equipment, and barely enough fuel to take off again. It was really about exactly perfect for its job, and I really think there's a possibility that there just isn't a practical, viable way to land something bigger and heavier with more people on it. I think the next lunar lander that actually works is going to have to be not much bigger than the original LEM was.
A lot of people don't like to think that way. When it comes to futurism and space travel especially there's a lot of really wild assumptions that people take for granted and inviolate - like, "in the future the technology will be better, so of course we'll inevitably be able to launch bigger and bigger rockets and land bigger things with more people on the Moon and then Mars". When you suggest that the physics is too prohibitive right now and might remain that way even in the future, they tend to dismiss that with "the science WILL be better, we WILL learn how to do it, it's JUST a matter of time, period". Like, some people will get mad at you for even suggesting it might not turn out that way.
www.instagram.com
