- Joined
- Sep 22, 2018
- Messages
- 42,521
- Location
- Moonbase Caligula
- SL Rez
- 2008
- Joined SLU
- 2009
- SLU Posts
- 55565
Well yeah basically. Why in the world did they choose Philadelphia for their get together?
Well yeah basically. Why in the world did they choose Philadelphia for their get together?
Govi, you gave me a lolwut reaction. Maybe you are unfamiliar but that was something Trump said. Why, I don't know.
Almost anything Trump says, has said, is eminently lol-worthy.Govi, you gave me a lolwut reaction. Maybe you are unfamiliar but that was something Trump said. Why, I don't know.
At least, they would be, if every word that came out of that orange blob's mouth wasn't slurped up as gospel by more than a third of our population.Almost anything Trump says, has said, is eminently lol-worthy.
I'm still not entirely sure if the people responding to this are just trolling us.At least, they would be, if every word that came out of that orange blob's mouth wasn't slurped up as gospel by more than a third of our population.
Skid Marks![]()
Crusty, Shrills and Naps.
I'm not a libertarian anymore and haven't been for many years, but the movement has changed a lot and not for the better... I feel like there is a rapidly growing gap between the philosophy and the right wing nut jobs who are filling it. the LP of NH seems to be especially nasty. The movement always attracted some people who were more contrarian than libertarian but I think it got a lot worse while Obama was in office. The "tea party" movement filled up with people who just thought libertarian meant SUPER right wing.
You have to be a very delusional, rich white asshole to think taxes are as bad as slavery...
I found an article from 1992 by the libertarian economist Murray Rothbard called “Right Wing Populism.” It was written shortly after Klansman and neo-Nazi David Duke had lost his late 1991 run for governor. Duke lost in a landslide to lovable Cajun crook Edwin Edwards, but he won a majority of the white vote. Rothbard saw in Duke’s failed candidacy a potential strategy for the right. What he wrote seemed eerily prescient to me:
The reality of the current system is that it constitutes an unholy alliance of "corporate liberal" Big Business and media elites, who, through big government, have privileged and caused to rise up a parasitic Underclass, who, among them all, are looting and oppressing the bulk of the middle and working classes in America. Therefore, the proper strategy of libertarians and paleos is a strategy of "right-wing populism," that is: to expose and denounce this unholy alliance, and to call for getting this preppie-underclass-liberal media alliance off the backs of the rest of us: the middle and working classes.
Link to unpaywalled versionWhat would the program for the middle and “working” class? Basically a familiar suite of hard right positions: slashing taxes, gutting the welfare state, attacking affirmative action and “the civil rights structure.” Rothbard might be nominally a libertarian but he wrote: “Cops must be unleashed, and allowed to administer instant punishment.” This would include not just a war on crime but on homelessness: “….unleash the cops to clear the streets of bums and vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares?” While he didn’t exactly call for protectionism, he also called for an “America First” economy: “Come home America. Stop supporting bums abroad. Stop all foreign aid, which is aid to banksters and their bonds and their export industries. Stop gloabaloney, and let's solve our problems at home.” Also, included was an attack on public schools and a call for parental control.
Interesting read and interesting writer. I read a couple more pieces of his including these: