- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 23,887
- SLU Posts
- 18459
Trump’s Iran Faceplant Ends at Obama’s Door
He wanted glory. Instead, he got the former president's shadow.
arstechnica.com
Iran claims it will charge US tech companies fees for using undersea Internet cables that run beneath the contested Strait of Hormuz shipping lanes. The war has already halted multiple projects and led to the suspension of cable repairs in the region—and the latest Iranian threats may accelerate efforts by Big Tech and Gulf countries to find alternative routes for bypassing the Strait of Hormuz’s digital chokepoint.
The latest assertions of Iranian authority over the Strait of Hormuz were announced in a brief statement by Ebrahim Zolfaghari, a spokesperson for Iran’s military and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. “We will impose fees on internet cables” Zolfaghari wrote in a May 9 post. It was not immediately clear how Iran might implement such fees or impose its rules on cable projects, given that the majority of routes pass through Oman-controlled waters.
This is just so embarrassing.... I bet he'll strike a deal with Iran that puts us in a worse situation than we were in with Obama's old deal, AND it came at a great cost of blood and treasure. ....AND he'll try to present it as a victory. Same with the trade talks as I said before. We'll be in a worse position than before, but he'll claim victory.![]()
There Is Only One Remaining Question--How Badly Has The USA Lost This War?
Hi All,phillipspobrien.substack.com
Evernote Link
More on the same themeThis is just so embarrassing.... I bet he'll strike a deal with Iran that puts us in a worse situation than we were in with Obama's old deal, AND it came at a great cost of blood and treasure. ....AND he'll try to present it as a victory. Same with the trade talks as I said before. We'll be in a worse position than before, but he'll claim victory.
We're basically worse off in every way than we were in 2016 except for the absurd bubble in the stock market if you count that.
I feel all warm plush bunnies about this.Vice President Vance said on Thursday that the U.S. was “very close” to finalizing an agreement with Iran, but a few sticking points remained.
The two sides have reached a tentative deal that would extend the already-fragile ceasefire for 60 days, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and launch further talks on the future of Tehran’s nuclear program, according to U.S. sources.
The proposed memorandum of understanding (MOU) is still awaiting approval from President Trump and Iranian leaders, with Vance saying on Thursday that negotiators were “going back and forth” on a few terms, including what to do about Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
The New York Times reports that in recent years, there were strong suspicions inside Iran that Israel, Britain and the US were cultivating ties with Ahmadinejad and those around him - suspicions that now seem to be confirmed by Israel’s apparent regime-change plan. The newspaper further reports that Ahmadinejad had recently travelled to both Guatemala and Hungary, countries with very close ties to Israel.
Does any of this make sense? And yet for western media, the fact that Netanyahu was championing Ahmadinejad as Iran’s saviour, and that the US administration wholeheartedly bought into this idea, is little more than “surprising”. In truth, it wrecks Israel’s entire narrative about Iran. It is a telling reminder of the yawning gap between what we have been told about Iran for decades, and what has actually been going on.
Image and reality bear almost no resemblance to each other. This has all been smoke and mirrors.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/israeli-claims-about-iran-threat-were-always-lie-now-we-have-proofMany of the claims promoted 20 years ago by Israel about Ahmadinejad’s genocidal intent stemmed from a mistranslation of a speech in which the Iranian leader had quoted the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who led the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
According to western politicians and media, Ahmadinejad had called for Israel to be “wiped off the map” - widely portrayed as an ambition to launch a nuclear strike on Israel. In fact, Ahmadinejad had been repeating Khomeini’s observation that Israel could not survive indefinitely in the form of an illegitimate Jewish supremacist state oppressing another people. He was pointing out that Israel’s days as a racist state were numbered, just as apartheid South Africa’s had been.
The sentiment behind Khomeini’s statement should be much clearer in the present circumstances, when it is Israel, not Iran, that has been busy wiping people off the map - in Gaza and southern Lebanon.