- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 64
Yes, Ethics is indeed hard! That's why I like to ask these hard questions. But yeah, you're right it's better to focus on what not to do than what to do.The so called platinum rule "Treat people as they want to be treated" is slightly better for many situations, but both rules are easy to pick apart with counter examples that make simple approaches to ethics hard.
For example, both rules imply I should just give random people tons of money, which isn't really reasonable... they are good guidelines, but every rule in ethics has tons of exceptions.
I tend to think the more important ethics rules are about what you do NOT do, rather than what you do. The idea that you shouldn't initiate force or fraud against people is popular among libertarians and MOSTLY good, but also has it's flaws in public policy.
TL;DR: Ethics is hard.
Or often put, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", sometimes phrased as, "Do unto others before they do unto you".The golden rule basically states to treat others as how you would want them to treat you.
I personally think it's a powerful guiding principle to stand by. But is it infallible? Can you think of any weaknesses or criticisms to this rule, or ways to strengthen it?
"Said the masochist to the sadist, 'Beat me, beat me!"The golden rule doesn't work for masochists and self destructive individuals.
"tolerate in others that which you would have them tolerate of you" doesn't work so great either, because a serious percentage of people lack basic empathy.
"Respect the autonomy and agency of others, or others will actively stop respecting you own" maybe?