- Joined
- Sep 22, 2018
- Messages
- 42,830
- Location
- Moonbase Caligula
- SL Rez
- 2008
- Joined SLU
- 2009
- SLU Posts
- 55565
Obviously they're jealous of A.I.'s success.The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools is accelerating rapidly across all layers of healthcare systems. Predictive models, decision support tools and generative tools have entered clinical environments1, and large language models are increasingly being used by the general public to seek medical information and advice2. Yet evidence that AI tools create value for patients, providers or health systems remains scarce.

arstechnica.com
An emerging artificial intelligence tool used by family doctors to take notes during an examination is at risk of providing physicians with inaccurate information and hallucinations, Ontario’s auditor general has found, raising questions about the ongoing use of the software in the health-care system.
In 2023, Ontario Health began introducing AI Scribe programs to the broader health-care sector, allowing physicians, family doctors, nurse practitioners and therapists to adopt the technology.
Once a patient has authorized its use, AI Scribe listens to medical examinations and compiles a “SOAP” note that intertwines subjective and objective information provided by the patient and physician. The resulting information is compiled into four areas — subjective, objective, assessment and treatment plan — making up the acronym SOAP.
While the tool was intended to relieve the note-taking pressures health-care workers constantly faced, the auditor general found the systems could be inaccurate and unreliable.
As medical behemoth Mayo Clinic continues to lead the way in incorporating artificial intelligence into clinical settings, a new lawsuit alleges that staff at the world-renowned hospital system had been skirting AI compliance rules and masking concerning error rates.
The civil action comes from former Mayo Clinic research director and AI compliance lead Traci Tamiko Eto, who sued her employer this week in federal court, saying she was retaliated against and fired after she blew the whistle on how the hospital’s rush to incorporate AI into their operations put patient care and privacy at risk.
Artur Davis, Eto’s attorney and a partner with the national law firm HKM Employment Attorneys LLC, told MPR News that this is a significant case, especially since it concerns the intimate and confidential patient data hospitals like Mayo Clinic have in their possession.
“If [people] care about the notion that AI has to be handled in a responsible manner, with integrity, and there have to be rules and guidelines, this is a case that should matter to you,” Davis said.