Facebook...er, Meta Hatred

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,670
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
Not sure where to post this. It’s Meta, and I hates it, so here.
Apparently it’s a recent ad? Wtf


Oh hey, so they've got legs. But everyone is sitting around...
 

Noodles

The sequel will probably be better.
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,123
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
Oh hey, so they've got legs. But everyone is sitting around...
Imagine them walking the way those arms are flopping.
 

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,670
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
  • 2ROFL
Reactions: Govi and Isabeau

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,670
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
I sense a coming disturbance in the force social media landscape.

Meta plans to test out X's algorithm for Community Notes to crowdsource fact-checks that will appear across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads.

In a blog, Meta said the testing in the US would begin March 18, with about 200,000 potential contributors already signed up. Anyone over 18 with a Meta account more than six months old can also join a waitlist of users who will "gradually" and "randomly" be admitted to write and rate cross-platform notes during initial beta testing.

Meta claimed that borrowing X's approach would result in "less biased" fact-checking than relying on experts alone. But the social media company will delay publicly posting any notes until it's confident that the system is working
 

Kamilah Hauptmann

Shitpost Sommelier
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
15,152
Location
Cat Country (Can't Stop Here)
SL Rez
2005
Joined SLU
Reluctantly
I guess the AIs weren’t reliably flattering to power so they’ll still need neckbeards for now.
 
  • 1burn
Reactions: Govi

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,670
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
More legal oopsies on Meta's behalf.

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta is in the middle of a fight to maintain its social media monopoly-like status, and it’s not making many friends along the way. According to The Verge, the company got an earful in the form of lawyer-submitted smackdowns from fellow tech giants who were less than thrilled over the fact that Meta’s legal filings in its antitrust case against the Federal Trade Commission were so poorly redacted that they revealed internal information from Snapchat, Google, and Apple.

The information revealed in the slides isn’t necessarily the most earth-shattering disclosures. As reported by The Verge, one slide showed data, seemingly from Apple, that shows the frequency of use of several different apps that have messaging features—including Apple’s Messages, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, and Snapchat—that suggested Messages dominated iOS when it comes to communications, not Meta’s offerings. Another slide, per The Verge, was titled “Snapchat in 2020: Competitors Are Succeeding and Not Just Meta Apps” and said apps other than Meta’s own are “thriving.”
But the fact that information made its way to public consumption was a pretty big “oops” on Meta’s part. The information was visible because of how the company redacted the documents, which it turned out was pretty easy to remove…which, of course, people did.
 

Khamon

Folk Harpist
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
3,112
Location
Alabama
SL Rez
2003
Joined SLU
2007
The traitor button is already programmed, but not yet visible, and might not ever be if Trump doesn't rescue the boy. Every answer in his testimony solidifies the truth that Meta == Zuckerberg. There is no corporation. There is him, personally, and his minions. He almost deleted the friends data!? He almost deleted the friends data. Choices
 

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,670
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
This is more on the AI side of things, but it's Meta so...

Meta has been accused of illegally using copyrighted material to train its AI models — and the tech giant's defense is pretty thin.

In the ongoing suit Richard Kadrey et al v. Meta Platforms, led by a group of authors including Pulitzer Prize winner Andrew Sean Greer and National Book Award winner Ta-Nehisi Coates, the Mark Zuckerberg-led company has argued that its alleged scraping over seven million books from the pirated library LibGen constituted "fair use" of the material, and was therefore not illegal.
Meta cited an expert witness who downplayed the books' individual importance, averring that a single book adjusted its LLM's performance "by less than 0.06 percent on industry standard benchmarks, a meaningless change no different from noise."

Thus there's no market in paying authors to use their copyrighted works, Meta says, because "for there to be a market, there must be something of value to exchange," as quoted by Vanity Fair — "but none of [the authors'] works has economic value, individually, as training data." Other communications showed that Meta employees stripped the copyright pages from the downloaded books.
If there's no "economic" value, then why put them to use for your training data? Hmm???
 

Noodles

The sequel will probably be better.
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
6,123
Location
Illinois
SL Rez
2006
Joined SLU
04-28-2010
SLU Posts
6947
That math feels bad and. 06% seems absolutely gargantuan of an improvement, especially if it's for every one of the 7 million+ books stolen.
 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Jopsy Pendragon

Bartholomew Gallacher

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
6,928
SL Rez
2002
Sarah Wynn-Williams, former high ranking manager at Meta/Facebook, wrote a book titled "Careless People" about her time there. She's giving a quite unfiltered inside look about how this social network is being managed and works. She was quite in touch with Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg and Joel Kaplan.

Meta tried to get the book suppressed, and secured an injunction to prevent her from promoting it, so that's why you probably have not heared about it yet. Zuckerberg is really pissed about the book.

This is how Cory Doctorow got to know about the book, he read it and gives a summary on his blog. And oh boy, work at Facebook is far more worse than anybody might have thought.

Wynn-Williams was in the beginning one of the few people telling Zuck to expand outside the US, but he didn't care. But when he dominated America, they suddenly felt the need to grow and she started flying with him on planes. BTW dominance is one of Zuck's bad traits, he hates to loose, which is why his employees let him win on purpose.

Quote Doctorow: "But those bosses – Zuck, Sandberg, Kaplan and others – are "careless." Zuck screws up opportunity after opportunity because he refuses to be briefed, forgets what little information he's been given, and blows key meetings because he refuses to get out of bed before noon. Sandberg's visits to Davos are undermined by her relentless need to promote herself, her "Lean In" brand, and her petty gamesmanship. Kaplan is the living embodiment of Green Day's "American Idiot" and can barely fathom that foreigners exist."

And of course we will happily censor in China and enable China to spy on American citizens: "According to Wynn-Williams, Facebook actually built an extensive censorship and surveillance system for the Chinese state – spies, cops and military – to use against Chinese Facebook users, and FB users globally. They promise to set up caches of global FB content in China that the Chinese state can use to monitor all Facebook activity, everywhere, with the implication that they'll be able to spy on private communications, and censor content for non-Chinese users."

 
  • 1Agree
Reactions: Kalel

Free

*censored*
VVO Supporter 🍦🎈👾❤
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
42,670
Location
Moonbase Caligula
SL Rez
2008
Joined SLU
2009
SLU Posts
55565
Lovely.

Meta’s ‘Digital Companions’ Will Talk Sex With Users—Even Children (archive.today)
Across Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp, Meta Platforms is racing to popularize a new class of AI-powered digital companions that Mark Zuckerberg believes will be the future of social media.

Inside Meta, however, staffers across multiple departments have raised concerns that the company’s rush to popularize these bots may have crossed ethical lines, including by quietly endowing AI personas with the capacity for fantasy sex, according to people who worked on them. The staffers also warned that the company wasn’t protecting underage users from such sexually explicit discussions.
 
  • 1Thanks
Reactions: Isabeau

Jopsy Pendragon

prosecute this entire 'white trash' presidency
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
3,059
Location
San Diego CA
SL Rez
2004
Joined SLU
2007
SLU Posts
11308
Where are the ijits trying to close down libraries because they contain books about same sex parents? Why aren't ... oh right, because they're fine with child brides, 'straight' pedophiles as long as they're rich, and biblical passages about incest, rape, fornicators with 'emissions like donkeys', etc.

That's all fine, but god forbid two boy penguins protect an egg together and it's all "OBSCENE ADULT CONTENT RAWR BURN IT DOWN! WITHHOLD MY TAX DOLLARS!!!"