WolfEyes
Well known member no one knows
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2018
- Messages
- 4,502
- SL Rez
- 2004
- Joined SLU
- 2009
I might (Ph.D. in Heritage Studies from Arkansas State University), but in fact he is not saying what you imply he is saying. Note how your quote makes a slight of hand and substitutes "patterns" for "rules." And patterns of language do mark region, race, and class. There is discrimination based on assumptions created by your language use, but that is not the same as setting the kind of inflexible "rules" that you seem to indicate exist. Reading the entire page, he is coming down on the side of descriptivists by examining the historical contingency of grammar and usage.
So if you hold that absolute rules exist, you ARE arguing with Adam Brock.
You asked me who has the authority to dictate the rules. I gave you the answer. RICH WHITE MEN.
You're also reading a lot more into my words than what is there. I have never said that I believe absolute rules exist (there are a few). Certainly not when the language is constantly changing and words take on meanings they never had before.
How about I become president and make Lakota the official national language.






