Can they withdraw the Article 50 notice, and shortly thereafter invoke it again as a way to reset the clock? Or is that prevented by the text of the article itself or EU rules?As a matter of both EU and UK law, the UK will leave the EU without a deal at the month unless either the EU27 agree to allow more time or unless the UK withdraws the A50 notification.
Theresa May planned to defeat herself, then decided not to defeat herself by defeating herself, then lost. To herself
It's prevented by the the ECJ's judgment in Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European UnionCan they withdraw the Article 50 notice, and shortly thereafter invoke it again as a way to reset the clock? Or is that prevented by the text of the article itself or EU rules?
Mind you, given some of the nonsense legal theories we've been hearing from some Conservative MPs today it wouldn't surprise me if someone tried. But I'm sure both our Supreme Court and the ECJ would both throw a fit.The revocation must be decided following a democratic process in accordance with national constitutional requirements.
This unequivocal and unconditional decision must be communicated in writing to the European Council.
Such a revocation confirms the EU membership of the Member State concerned under terms that are unchanged as regards its status as a Member State and brings the withdrawal procedure to an end.
It depends if you are shipping through Ireland or not.What will be the tariffs on popcorn in a no deal case?
Yes, I can see Bearcow doing that. Too bad he is not in US politics.I certainly hope Speaker Bercow rules a return of May's deal out of order. He certainly seems to be the Speaker that the House needs right now, someone to give cohesion and order to the cross-party consensus that seems to exist within the House.
Some channels like tldr news are doing a pretty good job. There will be a few seconds of floor footage then they will dissect what just happened and how unprecedented something was.I guess one has to be at least third generation Briton to have any real notion of what the **** is happening in the Commons.
I mean, Ministers voting against their own governments amendment and ministers leaving because they voted for that amendment.
The PM who has lost vote after vote still stays in office and will likely bring back her agreement for the third time for a vote within a few days.
And every expert interviewed on the BBC has another opinion on what is law, legal, possible..... nice.
My English isn't good enough and/or I'm to stupid and/or I can't understand because I'm not British...... but I'm lost now for sure.
Does anyone know why he does that? Presumably he wants people to read his tweets and has readers all around the world in different time zones.So he must have locked it again.
![]()
He says it's because he wants to keep trolls and spammers out of his timeline as much as possible. This way if things get out of hand, he can start banning people very fast.Does anyone know why he does that? Presumably he wants people to read his tweets and has readers all around the world in different time zones.
Sounds like putting up a 30 metre wall snd screaming to stay off your lawn ...He says it's because he wants to keep trolls and spammers out of his timeline as much as possible. This way if things get out of hand, he can start banning people very fast.
Is he a traitor? Or just some in-bred over-schooled anarcho-nihilist?Rachel Maddow closed her show tonight with a short segment on Nigel Farage. It seems he's doing his level best to convince an EU country, any country, to reject UK's request for more time. All he needs is one.
The most likely outcome of that would be Theresa May having to cancel Brexit, which is presumably what Farage wants, since his whole grift is being the leader of a vociferous anti-EU group. Brexit would put him out of a joblRachel Maddow closed her show tonight with a short segment on Nigel Farage. It seems he's doing his level best to convince an EU country, any country, to reject UK's request for more time. All he needs is one.
or his (Farge’s) financial investments require that the extension be blocked. Meanwhile in We Don’t Need No EU Fantasyland:Is he a traitor? Or just some in-bred over-schooled anarcho-nihilist?
Can we have "all of the above"? With a side order of "feckless" and an "arrogance" salsa dip?Is he a traitor? Or just some in-bred over-schooled anarcho-nihilist?
Nigel Farage, who wants to leave the EU because he says the EU is telling us what to do and because parliament should be sovereign has gone to the EU to get them to tell us what to do because he doesn't like what's happening in a sovereign parliament.Rachel Maddow closed her show tonight with a short segment on Nigel Farage. It seems he's doing his level best to convince an EU country, any country, to reject UK's request for more time. All he needs is one.